Page 2 - Casey Case News Today

Grasping at straws, not following precedent, whats the most logical conclusion, the simplest explanation, that this is a results driven ideological decision. and thats how they got to where they are. they have the numbers now. theyre going to do what they want to do, and were do seeing it in abortion, guns, religion, first amendment, administrative law next week or tomorrow, and its just off the rails. >> carrie, ill give you the last word. >> the right to abortion in the constitution, no. the c...

In 1992 with the casey case, planned parenthood v. casey the anti-abortion side thought they would win that. they lost then. their lesson was we cant count on the court. its surprising, 15 years ago i dont think the anti-abortion side thought they could count on the court. this is a surprising moment for them as well. >> you have written about this extensively, the chief justice of the united states john roberts has made it his mission to keep this court together and i put that word in quotation...

Cut an ad for a republican congress member, which raises all kinds of questions about what he is going to do in the future. >> right. it speaks to david m here in west virginia. he was first elected to the state legislature in west virginia in this area back in 1980 serving for more than four decades now. when you look at this new congressional district, this encompasses all of where he previously served. just about half of alexs only district is incorporated into this new district. when you loo...

Horns went sky-high this Saturday as the white team bested the blue team, 38-12, in the annual UB Spring Game. &nbsp&#x3B;

Appropriate care, and as you pointed out in your opening, were likely to see an increase in prosecution, primarily against black hand brown women who have less access to care and who are often singled out due to discrimination by authorities, going after them for criminal prosecution for essentially trying to have an abortion is n whatever means is appropriate and best for them. >> let me just -- >> the only thing i would add there, joy, this is the worst its ever been in this country since 1973...

There needs to be a special justification for overruling a prior precedent. >> nose principles applied in the casey case explain when cases should be revisited and when they should not and it is -- it is settled as a precedent of the court, yes. >> their actions and their worlds are sort of out of line here. do you agree with one "washington post" columnist, were going to put up a full screen of the article, who essentially says, they lied to us. >> i agree. yes, im sorry, i thought you were goi...

Of the courts impending decision? ~ . decision? well, what it will likely do. _ decision? well, what it will likely do. if— decision? well, what it will likely do, if it _ decision? well, what it will likely do, if it rules - decision? well, what it will likely do, if it rules in - likely do, if it rules in favour of mississippi, and essentially upholds the law that would prohibit abortion after 15 weeks, it will, the signal to at least 22 other states, but they also can pass laws that will in...

What relationships to enter into. what investments to make in their jobs and careers. i think of an individual level, there has been profound reliance. its servely the -- certainly the case that not every woman in america has had or wanted to exercise this right. but one in four american women have had an abortion. for those women, the right secured has been critical in ensuring they can control their bodies and their lives. i think theres a second dimension to it that casey also properly recogn...

Alito, essentially asking, if you go through the history of this, there was roe v. wade in 1973. then in 82, a pennsylvania case which was essentially a compromise allowing some restrictions on abortion rights. justice alito asking, can we have another compromise or do we have to throw it all out? listen. >> i read your brief to say that the only real options we have are to reaffirm roe and casey as they stand or to overrule them in their entirety. you say that, quote, there are no half measures...

Standard of self-has proved difficult to administer and that is relevant to the analysis. and i want to give you an opportunity to respond. >> yes, your honor. the first point id like to make is the undue burden test is not at issue in this case. that is the test that applies to regulations, not prohibitions. and the state has conceded that this is a prohibition. thats the title of this law. an act to prohibit abortion after 15 weeks. the only thing at issue in this case is the viability line, a...