Page 1000 - Conclusions News Today

Investigation. the way you prove as a from t prosecutor, somebodys intent, you dont have a magic telescope that sees inside their brain. you look at their words and actions over a long period of time and you ask a jury to form conclusions about the persons intent from those words and actions. so, for example, why was the president so angry at jeff sessions for doing what he was legally required to do by recusing himself? why did he talk about the attorney general protecting him? why did he fire ...

And theimmediate firing of comey. discerning intent is something you can do in many cases by examining conversations that your target or your subject has with the people around them. we know the president doesnt e-mail himself, but perhaps theres other documentary evidence. so speaking with trump himself really in many ways fulfills muellers obligation to test the truth. because one thing prosecutors dont want to do is to indict or to reach conclusions about someone whos innocent or whos not gui...

Property of the deutsche bank. those questions were not included. does that mean the special counsel is observing the red line that the president is trying to draw. in my view, the president is not permitted to draw the red line. anything thats compromising our national security is something that needs to be investigated. what was not on the list to me was also striking. >> on friday, you and your fellow democrats on the intelligence committee released a 90 something page report that was a respo...

Properties, through deutschbank, were there any russian guarantees of your loans? those questions are not included. does that mean that the special counsel is observing the red line the president has tried to draw? in my view the president is not permitted to draw a red line and anything that might be compromising of our national security is something that needs to be investigated if theyre credible allegations. so what was not on the list to me was also striking. >> on friday you and your fello...

Works specifically designed for a nuclear device. but the files again show that this is a lie. iran conducted extensive metallurgical work specifically designed for a nuclear device. heres an original iranian folder. plenty more in the archive. what im showing you tonight is just a fraction of the total material that we have. but even from this sample, you can draw four main conclusions. first, iran lied about never having a nuclear weapons program. 100,000 secret files proved that they lied. se...

The former v.a. nome knee ronny jackson, the doctor targeting a top democratic senator. how far does this nasty feud go from here? karl rove will talk about that coming up and plus this. >> only a few people would have had access to these facts and conclusions and it was leaked against the "washington post" and as far as i know no repercussions over that. >> sandra: congressman pete king is raising new questions over former obama director of national intelligence james clapper. did he break the ...

But the files again show it is it a lie. iran conducted metallurgical work for a nuclear device. there is plenty more in the archives. and so what i have shown you tonight is a fractions of the total material that we have. but even from this sample you can draw four main conclusions. first iran lied about never having a nuclear weapon program. 100,000 secret files proved that they lied. and second, even after the deal, iran continued to preserve and expand the nuclear weapons know how for future...

Read it in detail. i read about it. i understand the conclusions that they made, but i dont want to assert something that i havent done. this has been a long time coming. they broke down into partisan bickering on this months and months ago. my impression is by saying the russians didnt have a preference in this election, didnt want to defeat hillary clinton or elect donald trump, that doesnt square with the evidence. i spent a lot of time on this and read the classified version of the report of...

Reinvestigate and come to its own conclusions about the merits of the governments case. >> reporter: the russian government has always angrily denied magnitskys allegations of fraud and corruption. but what american prosecutors didnt know in 2014 was the role veselnitskaya may have played in crafting the official russian response. >> what i wanted to ask you about are these e-mails. if you could take a look at them. >> reporter: the documents are said to be e-mails exchanged between veselnitskay...

No way of knowing who the russians may have been favoring in the elook. suddenly on the front page of the washington post on december 7 of 2016 the story appears with all of this so-called classified information , how the russians were definitely behind donald trump, where did that come from? i mean brennan was head of the cia, clapper was director of national intelligence. did they launch an investigation and only a few people would have had access to these facts and conclusions and yet it was ...