Page 992 - Conclusions News Today

This. based on what we know, based on what you have heard on our air. based on what youve read from reliable sources, what conclusions can we realistically draw at this point about this particular school shooting? >> you know, theres so much that is still unanswered, and this is an active investigation. just as mark and darin and your other law enforcement commentators talked abs we cant go past mere speculation here. a couple things to emphasize. that we are hearing from some of your on the gro...

Through proper trade craft and proper review of their conclusions? from our report we felt like they didnt do a great job that have and that was our primary concern was how was the process. >> theres a big difference, here, though. you guys chose to say, chose to publicly doubt the assessment of the intelligence communities that russia was in this to help donald trump. that was your choice. that was a big point in your report and now we have the senate intelligence committee including the chair ...

Quote asked if i wanted to speak to him and i chose not to. >> thank you, sara. the senate intel committee breaking with house colleagues by backing with the assessment that russia meddled in the 2016 election. chairman richard burr said committee has spent 14 months reviewing the sources and we see no reason to dispute the conclusions. the house intel committee disagree was the intelligence community that vladimir putin was trying to help trump. republican congress member mike conway ran the ...

Saying it was focused on adoptions. there was no reason of clinton dirt. as a special counsel probes the meeting it is unclear how involved the president was in crafting it. his father may have commented through hope hicks. the former communications director. he said he did not request his fathers assistance saying hicks quote asked if i wanted to speak to him and i chose not to. i didnt want to bring him into something he had nothing to do with. back to you. >> thank you, sara. the senate int...

Where mr. mueller is. hes been very professional. clearly the white house is trying to interfere in that investigation. that is -- by the way they comment about it, by the way they try to discredit the investigation. to me, that is wrong. we have an independent department of justice and this is an independent investigation. let it come to its conclusions. >> the new york times has a deep dive this morning on the early stages of the fbi probe here. and part of it outlines how a government informa...

President, even without an indictment, mueller could still make a recommendation to the house of representatives. >> yep. >> a lot of political fall out. they can recommend impeachment, on and on and on. what trouble could that cause for the president? >> yeah, so i think it is really important and laura always does a good job of differentiating here. there is a legal path, right, and thats sort of the indictment path. and then there is a political path and thats the impeachment path. look, were...

There in the ethos. back to thish of t issue of the indictment. even without an indictment mueller can make a recommendation to the house of representatives, a lot of political fallout, they can recommend impeachment and on and on and on. what trouble could that cause for the president? >> yeah. i think its really important, and laura always does a really good job of differentiating here. theres a legal path, right? and thats sort of the indictment path. and then theres a political path and that...

Tactic? what do you think hes trying to do? >> i have no idea whats in his mind. all i know is they do try to distract from the need to have a thorough, complete and independent investigation as to what happened with russias engagement here in the united states. so they do try to distract. one thing is clear, no one is above the law, including the president of the united states. this is -- thats the hallmark of our system of government. that we are a country of laws, and accountability. so no on...

Sensitivity in interfering in an election. clearly they did not have enough information to draw any conclusions in regards to the trump campaign itself. so i think they did the right thing in not making any announcements. where i was disappointed is, of course, what they did to hillary clinton, where they made an announcement shortly before the election that they were reopening with information they received. that had an impact on the election. but i think as a general rule, the policy of the fb...

All, to the house, for possible impeachment. is that something you would actually proceed with, that you would ever have the votes for? >> well -- well, first of all, the president will testify before mueller. because mueller cannot complete the investigation of possible obstruction of justice without the presidents testimony. if the president doesnt do it voluntarily, he will subpoena him. >> youre confident in that, okay. >> the president will have to submit to a subpoena, even if theres a cou...