public, too. so you know what, i ll represent his voters, too, and they ll serve on committees but not a place that has national security because integrity matters to me. kevin mccarthy whose integrity is locked safely in a safe in mar-a-lago. retribution for dear leader donald trump and his min ons. also tonight, a new lawsuit and new outrage over governor desantis rejection of ap american studies because for he and his administration, learning the truth about african american history lacks educational value. a florida high school student who wanted to take that ap course is now getting ready to sue desantis and he joins me tonight. plus, the ukrainian military gets a big upgrade as the biden administration agrees to supply them with top of the line battle tanks. what it all means for this nearly year long war. house speaker mccarthy is making good on his threat to block adam schiff and eric swalwell from seats on the house intelligence committee. but before i tell yo
their fight for freedom, which is our fight for freedom. to your other point on donald trump going back on facebook, adam schiff has led many efforts to try to raise awareness around what it means to put donald trump back on social media because we know his words have power and they inspire and then the leaders in the republican party like speaker mccarthy, they don t condemn them. so when they re not condemned, they re a green light, open lane for more violence to occur. why don t you just add off that, i think facebook s decision to reinstate donald trump is inexplicable. it represents in my view, a total caving in and copping out. the only motive i can see is a profit motive here. if you look at what donald trump has been posting on his own social media platform, all of that violates facebook s policies. he s continued to give aid and comfort to those who committed acts of insurrection. he s continuing to spread the
worrying. how effective are - facemasks, would you say, i ve often heard them described as one tool against the virus, but, you know, short commutes, for example, or the doors opening and closing, people on and off, is it a risky environment? welcome a you know, there s been a lot of studies, particularly over the last year, it s difficult to do proper case control studies of the effectiveness of a facemask, but we know that they significantly contribute to the spreading of the virus from you if you are infectious. many people wanting to know that they are infected, one of the biggest single challenges with this coronavirus is the fact that there are many people walking around two are asymptomatic. he can be infected and asymptomatic even after being vaccinated, and you can still spread the virus. so wearing a facemask, the major effect if that is actually to stop you spreading the virus, and we know that contact particularly enclosed spaces for probably ten or 15 minutes for somebody
issue because you have so many candidates staking out a very pure position on medicare for all and anything seen as not truly pled care for all, you re copping out. but i think that the danger here is to act like the aca is perfect. and is in no need of any improvements. i don t think any democrat would say that that s true even democrats that support the aca. i think that while this is effective, i think he should at least allow there to be an opening to say look, the aca was a giant leap in the right direction but here s what i propose to improve upon it. he is talking about a public option. that was always a necessary piece of the puzzle because it would keep costs down. that s one of the major problems with the current law. one of the other things about this comes back to where people think they are. barack obama really did see himself as a bridge builder and essentially a center left figure although the iraq war bun issued him in a way with the base and
including what mr. mueller said just today, i think that s a much closer call. and irrespective of the political fallout one has an obligation to the constitution. so i think increasingly democrats are moving in that direction. and are willing to risk the political fallout if that s necessary. we re not there yet. but we re getting awfully close. so i m trying to understand what happens here next with mueller. now you have the doj and the special counsel s office, you know, copping out and saying, you know, there is no daylight here. you know, the confusion in the water the blood in the water continues to swirl. mueller said today, though, that this is it. this is all he is going to say and go ahead and read my report sbigs is see page 33, say page 453. he says he is not answering anything else. do you still want him to testify