remains will be joining her. he s in the general vault underneath the chapel now. so it is going to it s a multi-part commemoration and each part is going to be equally dramatic and i think the crowds in london and windsor are going to be extraordinary. right. when george vi, when he had the lying in state in westminster hall, in 1952, there was something like 305,000 filed by the catafalque an i think we re going to see way more than that. sally, thank you. sally smith, isa suarez and bianca, i m grateful. we see there the vigil continues with members of the various scottish regiments and military now taking their place as well at the catafalque. alison and victor, i think what you we ve said a million times and it s worth repeating we ve never seen anything like this before. we ve prepared for it. we ve known about it. but the size and scale of this is going to be so enormous. it will it will be other magnitude we ve not seen before, especially when the world le
indicted again. hunter biden facing nine new charges and up to 17 years in prison, three felonies and six misdemeanors for allegedly skipping out on a million and a half dollars in federal taxes. estimate living big and shelling out cash on serious debauchery. the filing details massive spending on, this is a direct quote, everything but his taxes. some call hunter indictment round two a, quote, nuclear bomb for the bidens. the president now staring down an impeachment inquiry vote and vying for re-election at the same time. fox news contributor jonathan turley says he has a bit of deja vu. remind me of clinton s sort of chest poking saying i did not have intimate relations with that woman. basically he is saying i did not have interactions with those people. it didn t work for clinton and it is even more insulting here. what the president is facing is a trap of his own making. july that in reference to this denial. i did not have sexual relations with that woman, miss le
feds why i have to ask this? why didn t the feds prosecute for these same facts? trump because he was an incumbent president. let me repeat that. how about when he got out? how about when he got out? prosecutors never once suggested that they didn t have a case against mr trump. in fact, they declared they had the same case against trump they did against cohen. they said that trump instructed cohen to pay hush money, but they couldn t prosecute that he was incumbent president. in fact, they called him and he he s not. he s not the president. now he s not the president. now. surely they took a look at him when he got out of office. so you re absolutely right. this justice department could prosecute for the federal crime that donald trump s justice department declared he had committed when he if somebody goes to jail for doing something, the person that directs you to do it doesn t it s because he was incumbent president now, mr bragg as the frontline prosecutor has taken the lead on the
that exists for it. no to the contrary, and i m not going to be specific here. so i ll say it. generally this case is about documents. it s about the southern district of new york justice department under donald trump, which conducted both the fbi search under extensive warrant of michael cohen s documents, and it s about all their investigations. and here s what the southern district of new york federal prosecutors said donald trump instructed michael cohen to pay illegal hush money to influence an election and that is what michael cohen to jail. so that s my district about okay, but the southern district passed right. i mean, they said that this was trivial, according to elie honig book and he broke it. they passed on taking the case that alvin bragg is gonna now prosecute. elie honig is inaccurate. he s making that up . there was no quote. then why didn t the then why didn t the
this crime, and the justice department is focusing its attention on the interaction, but certainly yes, there was a federal crime justice. department under donald trump declared that trump directed cohen to pay the hush money. lanny novel, risky, untested all words that have been used not by some conservative outlet but by the new york times and the washington post to discuss the alvin bragg case. if in fact it s so novel, risky and untested because they re trying to twin two different charges. why not just charged trump with the misdemeanor for the falsification of the business records? first of all, it is definitely untested because to raise the misdemeanor to a felony, you have to show another crime. that doesn t make it difficult. it just makes it untested. the second crime i just told you i can t keep repeating myself. michael, the justice department under donald trump. declared that he had