Canceled it . On friday, the New York Times wrote the following. Quote, a senior white house official told reporters that even if the meeting were reinstated holding it on june 12 would be impossible given the lack of time needed. President Trump 1307bded on twitter with this false accusation. Quote, the failing the New York Times quotes a senior white house official who doesnt exist, use real people, not phony sources. The source was, in fact, a senior white house official speaking to a large group of reporters in the White House Briefing room. We journalists try as hard as we can to always identify our sources on the record so that we can tell you, our viewers, watchers, listeners, why you should trust our information. Sometimes we agree to allow people to speak anonymously. Well refer to that as talking on background. Nbc news does know the identity of this official, although were not identifying him because we agreed not to. We, however, do not invent people. If we did, we would an
Prosecutors, including that secret recording made of trump just before the 2016 election. As anybody would say, thats the strongest possible evidence. There certainly was evidence of knowledge by the president of a payoff to the playboy playmate. We begin this morning with the president threatening to strip the Security Clearance of half a dozen former officials. Never mind some of them dont even have clearance anymore. That is not stopping the white house from stthe policy of paybk to vocal critics. I want to get to how it breaks down. The president is said to still be considering this move. While none of his people hes targeting are still in the government, current officials are certainly taking notice. Right now, these are the men and women on the list. Former cia director john brennan. Former director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Former cia director michael hayden. Monetary gain. No, that wasnt an snl skit. We already know the president has attacked u. S. Intelligence ag
The latest news from around the world with host Brooke Baldwin. Its not an order. Its the president s opinion. Its ridiculous all the corruption and dishonesty thats gone on with the launching of the witch hunt, the president has watched this process play out. He also wants to see it come to an end, as he stated many times. We look forward to that happening. Hes fighting back. He stated his opinion clearly. Hes certainly expressing the frustration he has with the level of corruption weve seen from people like jim comey, peter strzok. Theres a reason the president is angry and frankly most of america is angry as well. Theres no reason he shouldnt be able to voice that opinion. Once again, as i said earlier, the president stating his opinion. Its not an order but hes been, i think, Crystal Clear about how he feels about this investigation from the beginning. You said a moment ago the investigation itself is corrupt, the Mueller Investigation. You mentioned comey and
could that tweet in
Is his strategy working . I will ask Legendary Newsman carl bernstein, here to talk about the latest scoop on cohen v. Trump. Whats next for sinclair . Will the angry tweets affect the fccs decision . First, another chapter in the Me Too Movement brought to us once again by rowan farrow, out in print tomorrow is about les moonves and the culture of cbs. Its been eight months since charlie rose was fired from cbs this morning. And now the famed Broadcast Network is again having to report on itself. The New Yorker Magazine is reporting six women have accused cbs chairman and ceo Leslie Moonves of Sexual Harassment and cbs news chairman and current 60 minutes Executive Producer jeff fager allowed harassment. The story is about much more
than moonves, its about cbs as a whole, about how Major Media Companies are still having to reckon with the past about alleged abuse that happened in the past and, in some cases, not too long ago. These are issues that have to be addressed by cbs and by ot
Anderson Cooper takes viewers beyond the headlines with indepth reporting and investigations. No collusion, which i knew anyway. No coordination, no nothing. No nothing, he says. No collusion. His response to the revelation his closest Campaign Adviser sought dirt on hillary clinton. His response after the house and Senate Intelligence committees re released their reports on russian interference. His response to nearly any question the president has ever gotten, no collusion. If not the two foundational words of his entire administration, then at least the linchpin of his defense that is until our reporting that his former lawyer and confidante is now willing to tie the president directly to that meeting with russians during the campaign. Now that Michael Cohens apparently ready to say that Candidate Trump knew in advance about what amounts to at best an attempted collusion or intended collusion or unrequited collusion. The line of defense has a new wrinkle, moving from never happened