Page 5 - E Mailing News Today

To ask us years from now a question and that question is going to be, where were you at that inflection moment? and what i know, los angeles, what i know is our answer is not simply going to be how we felt, our answer is going to be what we did. what action we took. the streets we marched. the e-mailing, the phone calls, the text messaging, the voting. we will speak truth to power. we will act on our words. we will vote. we will act and we will not relent. we will not tire. we will keep fighting...

Years from now, our children, our grandchildren, folks are going to look at us and theyre going to ask a question. the question is going to be, where were you at that inflection moment? what i know, los angeles, what i know is, our answer is not simply going to be how we felt. our answer is going to be what we did. what action we took. the streets we marched. the e-mailing, the phone calls, the text messaging, the voting. we will speak truth to power. we will act on our words. we will vote. we w...

Of all of this came down. it was via private letter that kim jong-un sent to president trump. and thats his number two giving it personally to the president yesterday in the white house. it looked like a big letter to me, maybe it had a music cal card, i didnt read it, i dont know. i know the power of the written word and the power of letters period and in this day i like to remind my teenage sons, youre so into texts and tweets and e-mails, harken back to a time where the written world mattered...

Heres a question to the best of your knowledge, did the president provide any edits to the initial statements meeting about adoption or other input? he may have commented through hope hicks. do you know if his comments were incorporated into the final statement? >> i believe some may have been. what do you think of that? >> we understand that episode is of keen interest to bob mueller and his team as they explore the possibility of obstruction of justice because it starts to look like there was ...

Looking at. >> heres another thing i found interesting on the media management/obstruction question. this trump lawyer pons up in here, alan garton who is going to all the parties e-mailing goldstone before the story breaks. theres something odd about the fact that this person is not someone from the white house or the campaign. he works for the private business of the president of the united states and hes going to line up everyones stories. we didnt know that before. >> yeah, i was struck by t...

This agreement. he never signed it. furthermore, where is the consideration from dd? the agreement and as you know there has to be consideration from dd. everybody talks about the $130,000. but you know based on your detailed review of the agreement and the tabs that you have on the side of the page, you know that my client bargained for not just money, my client bargained for other consideration from mr. trump. it is in the document that he was required to provide. and by not signing it, my cli...

Caused them to obstruct justice and defy congress, to be held in contempt in order not to turn over not just these documents but likely other documents that will let you understand why they deliberately let two dozen weapons go to the worst of the worst hotels. >> sandra: do you think theyll hold the answers. >> i think it will show eric holder was very involved in the obstruction of justice. a man who proudly says hes a lawyer and should be disbarred had an active role, texting, e-mailing, help...

>> the provision of taking something of value from a foreign entity to the campaign. but heres the other thing because also roger stone is paul manaforts former business partner which is also intriguing. the question then becomes, natasha, whether or not all of these individuals are separately seeking dirt on hillary clinton in the form of e-mails. george papadopoulos saying we think the russians will have dirt on hillary clinton. the son, donald trump jr., saying the same thing and then going t...

Use them to elect donald trump, thats enough and its a conspiracy to violate the federal computer hacking law, which is the computer fraud and abuse act. and thats where i think all of this is going. >> the provision of taking something of value from a foreign entity to the campaign. but heres the other thing because also roger stone is paul manaforts former business partner which is also intriguing. the question then becomes, natasha, whether or not all of these individuals are separately seeki...

Reporting is one of the newly released e-mails between somebody at the meeting and his son raises the question of just that. the son e-mailing and asking why don jr. would release the e-mails that led up to this meeting. that was the first news we all were reporting on and asking this, why was he admitting collusion. we dont know the context. if they saw it then, what does this mean for team trump now? >> well, i think every piece of evidence that establishes a connection between team trump and ...