in fact, it s absolutely outrageous. the president reportedly told donors at that same mar-a-lago event and i m quoting here from what sources at the event told axios. quote, the democrats hate jewish people. but it s not the first time that he d said something like that. in fact, he said it on camera, out loud, for all the world to hear. the democrats have become an anti-israel party. they ve become an anti-jewish party. i can t believe i have to explain this. what the president is saying is not true, okay? follow along. i want you to pay close attention. it s another lie, and it s a big one. take a look at the exit polling from the midterms. jewish voters, just 2% of voters overall, overwhelmingly supported democratic house
to galvanize around one particular candidate. yes, let s at get to the debates. charles: we do have a major divide on display today. aoc coming to the aide of her freshman congresswoman, ilhan omar and this idea of anti-semitism, asking about what about anti-islamism and those things. there s a serious divide. you have moderates, left leaning and the ultra level. it s a cauldron. it s amazing to watch. it is. look, i experienced this back in the last election. it was very difficult for me at the time to try to unify and have our cumbaya moment but we got there. exit polling showed that we captured 81% of people that voted for bernie. it was a net positive because he registered so many voters. so i m hoping to do the same.
buts there was quite a bit of data, exit polling that showed he was getting support not just from people who were to the left of hillary clinton but also people who identified themselves as being to the right of hillary clinton. he did much, much better among white men than women, even though it s not as if white men are known as being a democratic particularly committed to social democracy. so it s not dleer me whether the second time around in a diverse field wlrksz he can consolidate all the support, which was not enough to get him the nomination. that cashes out in money. and that is not a small thing because it means he has this constant source of funding that
buts there was quite a bit of data, exit polling that showed he was getting support not just from people who were to the left of hillary clinton but also people who identified themselves as being to the right of hillary clinton. he did much, much better among white men than women, even though it s not as if white men are known as being a democratic particularly committed to social democracy. so it s not dleer me whether the second time around in a diverse field wlrksz he can consolidate all the support, which was not enough to get him the nomination. that cashes out in money. and that is not a small thing because it means he has this
against is the difference between the way women are treated and men are treated. i raise the kevin mccarthy issue, about substantively benefitting to the claim of native identity and that story actually came out over a month ago and did nothing. elizabeth warren without any proof she financially benefited this is what we re talking about. i wonder how much she s a democrat and a woman? i think a lot of that is she s a woman. let s not forget 2016 sexism played a huge role in that election and we saw that in focus groups and polling, we saw that when people were coming out of the exit polling and talking about why they voted for donald trump and how they felt about hillary clinton or a woman being president. so that was really clear. you see it now, the likability. let s not forget when elizabeth warren first came out with her exploratory committee in december, there was this whole