official about former vice president biden or his son nor do i recall take part in any effort to encourage an investigation into theed bience. both of those mened under oath. out front now, the general counsel of the defense department, greg brower, a s assistant director of the fbi. abby philip and david arben who was an adviser to the 2020 campaign and a washington lobbyist. let me start with you, ryan, and here s the thing. both of these men testified under oath, okay? this is a sacred thing you do in this country, you testify under oath and this is what vindman said. vindman s version completely dove tails with taylor and anyone else that s testified thus far.
impeachment and he ll be able to by developing digital tools, so he can use less water to grow crops. cross-examine witnesses and represented by counsel and that s the case when he s tried at bayer, this is why we science. in the senate as we move forward on articles of impeachment. before i go, congressman, if you can just let me know if you can match the power of energizer. were in the room today and did because energizer ultimate lithium is you learn anything specific from the longest lasting aa battery in the world. colonel vindman beyond what we have all seen in the opening statement? [confetti cannon popping] yes. energizer. lieutenant colonel vindman was backed by science. an extraordinary witness, a matched by no one. person of incredible integrity. he was a very credible witness and of course, an eyewitness, in a sense. he was on the call in which the president asked the new president of ukraine to investigate his political opponent. so he had first-hand knowledge which he
i don t know. you tell me. greg, he cares deeply about finding out who this person is. that s clear. he s obsessed with it like he has been obsessed with fbi agents who are investigating him and prosecutors who are looking at potential criminal conduct and others who judges who have ruled against him in litigation. he s always going after those who he feels are somehow out to get him. you remember several months ago when he made a point of kr criticizing cooperators or rats as he called them in criminal investigations and it s a way that he attacks those who appear to be looking at potential criminal wrongdoing on his part, and so the whistle-blower is just the latest target for the president in that regard. all right. thank you all very much. i appreciate your time. next, a new report says
with politics getting involved saying it would complicate things and make it not bipartisan. he didn t really talk about aid being withheld and the specifics being talked about by the congress. so, greg, let me ask you on the issue of the whistle-blower. i think we can all sit here and say that it doesn t matter, right? because what matters is if what the person said is true or not true, but it matters to the president and it s clear it matters to him because of what he said multiple times. here he is talking about the whistle-blower. i think we have to find out who the whistle-blower is that would give all this false information. the whistle-blower got it all wrong? who is the whistle-blower? who is the whistle-blower? who is the whistle-blower? we have to know. is the whistle-blower a spy? you know, these whistle-blowers, they have them like they re angels, okay? so doav a totally false account of my conversation?
and this is as i emphasize statements under oath because again, greg, i want to make the point that sondland s testimony, quote, if ambassador bolton, dr. hill and others harbored misgivings, they never shared those very people who testified under oath that did exactly what he says they didn t do. right, erin. that appears to be potentially problematic for the ambassador. all of the evidence so far and as a prosecutor i look at the evidence. the evidence so far tells us that the version of events that we heard from the colonel today has been corroborated by other witnesses including ambassador taylor and other documentary evidence, e-mail, et cetera. the entire context and simple logic, and so you put it all together and it looks like there is a version of what happened, that is the truth and then there s ambassador sondland s version. the other thing they think is important to look at here is