A roundtable ensemble discusses and debates the days news. Shows 85 of people dont care, as an example, about gender. They are not going to base their vote on gender and yet thats all of 2016 wise. Vote for hillary. First woman president. Or vote for this person. The first of this or that. Americans are not carrying. It doesnt work. Her position, this is not working. We have relied on it. Lets retreat. The president is just being consistent. It was with the campaign was. We are all in this together. The numbers prove its growth. The Unemployment Numbers are extraordinary. Everyone has been lifted. Its this thing he promised. Its based on all of us seeing each other as a neighbor. Thats what resonates with the American People and thats why its working. Dana richard, i imagine you disagree. I will give you the floor. You can tell us why. Greg dont give him the floor. Just give him the table. We can say a muslim man can be the first governor, the first muslim governor in this country, in
Former GOP representative Joe Scarborough and Mika Brezinski interview newsmakers, politicians and pundits about the issues of the day. Elections . When were picking whos going to be running the house and the senate . I think right track wrong track is a very important indicator. That and theres often polling numbers of, does this guy or this person, this Candidate Fight for people like you . Those are the type of polls i find a little more credible. Astonishing to me is that it can be down at 35 when the economy on its surface and in its aggregate numbers is doing so well. Id ask an expert like John Heilemann or somebody, have you ever seen right track being 35 when unemployment is below 4 . And since i think the economic numbers wont always be as good, this could really tumble down if theres if there starts to be any blips in the economy. Especially from this continued china trade dispute, which could, you know, start bringing down the economy a little bit. So, joe, since walter invi
About fighting corruption, we should also say specifically, burisma in 2016. Mr. Yermak provided me a statement. I wanted to be assured that this statement would actually correct the perception that mr. Giuliani had of ukraine and what they stand for now so that that would also be conveyed to President Trump and solve this problem that i had observed with our may 23rd meeting with the president. The problem being that he is getting a bad set of information, a Statement Like this could potentially correct that. Was mr. Guiliani satisfied with the statement . No, he was not. He believed it needed to say burisma and 2016 specifically or else it would not be credible, would not mean anything. So in fact, mr. Guiliani wanted a statement that Referenced Burisma and the 2016 elections explicitly. One that would benefit, essentially, President Trump. It is to invest or come here is the text you sent to the ukrainian official on August August 13th. Lets put that up on the screen. You said, hi,
look, this is a tough work of international diplomacy and negotiations and i m not surprised about the criticism but the reality is, if you get into the details of this deal it is pretty smart. we get americans back who are held in a terrible prison. we release funds that can only be used for humanitarian purposes. they will be supervised by our ally qatar, who will actually have to make the payments themselves out of a bank account in qatar to only buy grain and food stuffs and things like that. but this is what you have to do. you have to make deals like this if you want to get americans free. it s a tough world out there. look, the same criticism was issued to president reagan at the height of the cold war when he negotiated with the soviets and the evil empire. a lot of conservative republicans at the time criticized the president for making deals with the soviets.