An email dr. francis collins and she regarded the decoration where he called for a quick and devastating published takedown of its premises. to be clear, this was not dr. collins suggesting that you suggest or censor at the declaration. he was suggesting that the points you just explained, memorialized to refute the scientific premises of the great barrington declaration. is that correct? yes. there is good reason for dr. collins to have substantive concerns. lifting mitigation measures for the vast majority of society and perverting them from populations including the elderly and people with underlying health conditions. this was months before a vaccination was available in public health systems were being overwhelmed. thousands of americans were dying daily. doctors fauci, what percentage of the population needed to be infected with covid before we
The corrupt plan. it was ultimately executed in arizona. here s how that attorney, who just got briefed on the phone, describe the plot. kind of wild, creative, i m happy to discuss. my comment too cheseboro is i guess there s no harm in it, legally, at least. i don t that s great judgment. we would just be sending in fake electoral voters to pence so that quote someone in congress can make an objection when they start counting votes and start arguing that the fake votes should be counted. fake electors in quotes there. the fake vote should be counted by a lawyer briefed on the plan. memorialized in an email. is that speech? the truth of the matter is, in the defense the ex presidents trying to mount, speech maybe in for the rest of the conspiracy. but fundamentally the
When they start counting votes and start arguing that the fake votes should be counted. fake electors in quotes there. the fake vote should be counted by a lawyer briefed on the plan. memorialized in an email. is that speech? the truth of the matter is, in the defense the ex presidents trying to mount, speech maybe in for the rest of the conspiracy. but fundamentally the conspiracy s conduct. in this one section of the damning indictment, you have something that just can t have had any purpose other than to be fraudulent. there is no defensible first amendment law where you can say well, they were just speaking. no, they were clearly not. they did something.
And ultimately, as we re seeing again, just a few blocks from where we are, it will happen there, and there will be 12 jurors who will make that ultimate decision. in talking to officer hodges yesterday, it really came back to me that every time we play the tape, i asked him before we played the tape of him under attack, literally having his head crushed, and screaming in pain, and he said no, play it. he wanted it to be seen. and he said it does trigger something for all of them. there were a number of suicides, other deaths connected to what was experienced that day and the days after. officer sicknick, of course, his been memorialized and commemorated, and his family, but as you were just talking about the young people as well and the staffers, three officers we can report were not in the courtroom itself, they re in the overflow room among some of the media. they wanted to be there.
Reimagining of the truth is not retold in way that it removes the deg anity, the sacrifice and horrific nature of what happened there because we don t want that repeated. she went on to call her aunt, till s mother, mamie till-mobley, a hero. she will also be memorialized. she insisted on an open casket funeral so the world could bear witness to her son s gruesomely mutilated body. some monuments have been shot at. it will consist of three protected sites. the first unveiled at the chicago church where till s funeral was held. other will be at the courthousen sumner, mississippi, where that all-white jury acquitted till s murderer after an hour of deliberation. the third site believed to be