do over? you know, um,ible yes me no. i know there are going to be respond to that what does he think perfect? absolutely, i m the first to amendment i m far from perfect. but when you say do over? you know i really can t see something i would do completely over. katie: we ll respond to that mr. fauci may have been wrong about everything from lockdowns to triple masking to getting quadruple boosted but when the truth came out he never admitted he was wrong. he just told you that he was the science. they get up and really aim their bullets at tony fauci. well, people could recognize there s a person there so it s easy to criticize. but, they are really criticizing science. because i represent science. i m the bad guy to an entire subset of people because i represent something that is uncomfortable for them. it s called the truth. it s very dangerous, chuck, because a lot of what you are seeing as attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science. katie: they wer
that supports what lee said. there needs to be more oversight and more accountability. mr. chairman, my time is expired. these points are very clear to all of us today in this hearing room. i yelled back. i now recognize mr. garcia he left. i now recognize miss green from georgia for 5 minutes of questions. thank you, mr. chairman. mr. fauci, you were quoted saying, it is easy to criticize, but they are really criticizing science, because i represent science. do you represent science, mr. fauci? i am a scientist that uses the scientific method to gain information. you said you represent science. do you represent science, yes or no? that s not a y a yes or it s a yes or no. we will take that is you don t know what you represent. this is director of the nih, you did sign off on these so-called scientific experiments. i want to tell you, this is disgusting. and evil. what you signed off on in these experiments that happened to beagles, paid for by the a
an email dr. francis collins and she regarded the decoration where he called for a quick and devastating published takedown of its premises. to be clear, this was not dr. collins suggesting that you suggest or censor at the declaration. he was suggesting that the points you just explained, memorialized to refute the scientific premises of the great barrington declaration. is that correct? yes. there is good reason for dr. collins to have substantive concerns. lifting mitigation measures for the vast majority of society and perverting them from populations including the elderly and people with underlying health conditions. this was months before a vaccination was available in public health systems were being overwhelmed. thousands of americans were dying daily. doctors fauci, what percentage of the population needed to be infected with covid before we
To get to the bottom of covid-19, it’s best to follow the money. On February 1, 2020, Dr. Michael Farzan, Dr. Kristian Andersen, and Dr. Robert Garry met with Dr. Anthony Fauci, then Director of [.]