Commission and the director to make a finding to about so as a Redevelopment Area plan it is distinct from our normal city process because you can utilize secondary use for changeswith some i concerned a change from the planted the me ask you this question. The balance of the sports arena were not compliant it in the original Mission Bay South plan. What was . Whatsit of a change i can think of, of course, the imagine was not contemplated in the plan was the hospital. Because that something that was developed that occurred later. What hospital consulate in the original Mission Bay South plan . Supervisor kim thats absolutely correct. Was to that neither the hospital nor the event center were contemplated in the eir. They were, however, allowed under the redevelopment plan as secondary uses, which i noted broad categories that some definitions that apply. For both the hospital and the event center. But, we admit the eir do not look at the particular impacts of either the hospital or the
Commissioner swig commissioner wilson will be absent this evening to my left is robert bryan the City Attorney with legal advice and im Cynthia Goldstein the boards executive director we will also be joined by were joined by representatives from the City Departments that have cases before this board. An easter person and anticipating Joe Duffy Rincon point the department of building inspection and Scott Sanchez representing the Planning Department and Planning Commission and from the tragically and rebecca the Deputy Director and commission barbara phones and other Electronic Devices are prohibited. Out in the hallway. Permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes no rebuttal. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speaker
Thats it. Thank you thank you. Next speaker good afternoon i live in the panic can im the secretary for the Golf Alliance and im a lawyer i met my husband through the alliance i guessed thats a good thing. Do you see much of him and yeah. Im a latino and ive been a litigation attorney golf is a passion and im here to tell you as past code champ that this is not just a golf course its a truly a place where the Community Meets and young people are out there enjoying that golf course. You get young people away from their ipods and games have them walk in the beautiful course maybe theyll become loyal to protecting the environment. As std we play and protect we have an understanding of how important the balance is. Ive golfed with the folks here in mexico and ive seen the balance that can be struck between golfers and the project. Lets get this thing started and keep people out there. Its too good of o a resource for everyone its a great resource for affordable golf can we please hold than
It is really all about cesar sanchez, [speaker not understood]. Its time for people to organize new civil rights, make thing this earth provides for us all. I hope thats the message tonight. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker. Hello, good afternoon, supervisors. My name is douglas yip and i have lived in San Francisco for 63 years. I would like to thank the citizens that came here for Public Comment on this issue. I think its very important that the supervisors know that they are being observed. So, this way they know for the record it just isnt the federal government observing them. Secondly, i would also like to say that since San Francisco prides itself, so much as being a green environmental city, why would two major agencies be against a full eir . If you look at it logically, if you have nothing to hide, you would just do the eir, get it over with, and then the opposition would just be satisfied and there would be no argument. When you oppose an eir, one has a suspicion, a suspic