after last week's january 6 oh seven oh please period mind nothing has been added or subtracted it is real and authentic not a deep think not one —- fake not by russian box with dead on political analysis. >> one of the things that has been remarkable is how nonpolitical this has been. there is no way this is like the impeachment was like the second impeachment was warranted as it was. you cannot do that with us. >> nonpolitical? >> nonpolitical? not an attack on donald trump
now time for a little bit of comedy for your ring join and after last week's january 6 oh seven oh please period mind nothing has been added or subtracted it is real and authentic not a deep think not one —- fake not by russian box with dead on political analysis. >> one of the things that has been remarkable is how nonpolitical this has been. there is no way this is like the impeachment was like the second impeachment was warranted as it was. you cannot do that with us. >> nonpolitical? not an attack on donald trump
. >> one way to clear this up is to have the agents come up and answer questions whether public or private session if you don't want to put them on the stand. they could come and testify under oath. >> i think the secret service would like to position itself as nonpolitical. we are police officers, law enforcement. we are here to protect and serve and we are not going to get involved in the political conversations that may happen around us but the more we hear about january 6th and what was going on, with trump and his inner circle, the secret service did make decisions on that day and perhaps the days leading up to that, so i don't know if in good faith, a lot of the agents who were involved and who were right there had a front row seat can kind of have that talking point that we are just a fly on the wall because again, decisions were made that
i mean, we did suffer a pandemic. we do have putin invading ukraine. we do have, you know, big oil -- >> sean: let meet -- let me throw you a lifeline. >> nonpolitical reasons for this dilemma. >> sean: charlie, we have all of the resources here. this is the main point. we don't need to deal with a murdering five dictator in venezuela. the iranian mullahs, the crown prince coming he's going to get on hands and knees and kiss his ass and begged them to produce more oil, we don't have to deal with these countries. we were energy independent under donald trump. >> precisely. precisely. and you know, the problem with joe biden and democrats is not the full pause. the problem is their policies, and their policies have been -- are specifically designed to design to ensure that the united states of america is not energy independent, which means in the united states of america has to go around the globe and
office to cooperate as well despite chairman thompson's comment? >> and they certainly are. and i think that, you know, what you are describing is chairman thompson's comments are not accurate. it's not an accurate description of what the chairman has said. and, you know, he leads the committee. and as i said, you know, we have got five investigative teams on the committee, one of those five teams is focused precisely on this. all of our teams are staffed with nonpolitical, professional prosecutors and investigators, and those security issues are going to be a focus of one part of this investigation. >> bret: what do you say to somebody sitting at home who may say listen, i think that day was horrible, what happened that day was horrible. but i'm worried about getting my kids to school. i'm worried about what's happening with covid, i'm worried about the next economic blip that i may face, and they look at the focus on 1/6 and say why is this so important that i have to -- that everything gets
in leadership, and you -- who weren't necessarily in leadership. you work your way up to the top that way. here's the culmination of a lot of careful and nonpolitical legally and factually driven work by the department of justice. >> let me get you on two january 6th committee-related things. the subpoenas of social media tech companies by the committee. the significance of that, maya? >> well, look, it's very significant. you can see it in the oath keeper indictment. you can also see it in the charlottesville civil trial. it is that the right has been organized -- particularly extremists, organized on social media, encrypted chat rooms, messaging. and so to get those texts, those dms, the communications that establish how was this planned, who was involved, what were they saying, helps the committee
of these people, something changes. she thinks it was around the time that he was shot that he started to espouse these -- that he shot himself, to be clear -- that he started to espouse these more kind of extremist type of views. she helped formed, and totally denounces the oath keepers now and their beliefs, but helped form it in march of 2009, that's when this all started to take off. and over time, the groups are believed to have really kind of changed. at first, more antigovernment, nonpolitical, not backing any candidate, to turning into something that turned decisively pro-trump. and obviously that's why we're looking at these sedition charges and the allegations that the justice department brought forward yesterday. >> tom winter, thank you so much for your reporting. and thanks to morgan chesky who
tell you geraldo, i'm tired of the republicans playing by the supreme bearer rules. i'm tired of that. i'm not saying you have to be an animal about it, let's just let people know that we have to slap in there too when we. and not everybody is perfectly playing. come on, you know i'm talking about. i'm tired about figuratively. what they did, it was outrageous. and in the end what americans want is a judge who was who is confident, who is smart and nonpolitical. we don't want politics in the united states supreme court. and you know what, if you want to pick a woman of color that's fine. just make sure that she is confident. okay, you had your say this is my turn. right now you have confident judges, you have judged jackson, you have several of men who have
expert then donald trump ever was as a politician. if you want anyone in this country to ever listen to "health experts" again, there's proof of a study that says this dude had no idea what he was doing or advocating for. he got it wrong on masks, vaccines, he got it wrong an outbreak cases, got it wrong on children in school. got it wrong with the 6-foot rule. he got it wrong with limiting people going to places, he got it wrong on everything it it's time for him to resign. >> harris: i'm going to kind of come back to you on this point, because you so eloquently listed all of those things, some of which the study looked at. i want to reinforce this notion. this is johns hopkins university. many times when you see the numbers on the side of the screen of all the cases, they are like the most trusted source. they are looking at this, nonpolitical. if they didn't just look at a
are going to investigate. the cabinet secretary, of course, is nonpolitical. he has the authority, as one would expect of the head of the civil service, to call for whatever material, whether it be documents or otherwise, that he wishes and he will have the support and assistance of the several thousand lawyers in the government legal department and, of course, others if he needs it. my others if he needs it. my constituents in catering are very angry indeed at reports of christmas parties in downing street during what was a very large second wave of covid and the behaviour was totally inappropriate. —— my constituents in kettering. and possibly criminal. does my right honourable friend agree that serving the public, whether as a member of parliament or civil servant is a privilege and that the public should be treated