unfair and not the way you go about trying to force your way. what do you say? >> thanks, neil, for having me there for the president is absolutely right. we are talking but a hold on general and flag officers, they are nonpolitical, in a fight that should not be political. these are folks that are stationed all around the world, for a selected come at a time when we need them most come at a time when the acute threat of russia is rising in europe and the growing challenge of china. we need our best team on the field and that means the senate confirmed nominees who are up for nomination being held currently by senator tauber available need to be confirmed by the senate, and just earlier this week on monday, the secretary participated in a change of responsibility of office of the marine corps of the commandant, so right now, in acting commandant of the marine corps, who is by the way doing two jobs, both the commant job and the assistant commandant. we will have many more of these
the tragedy,al the tragedy and the psychological scars for this poo r baby breaks your heart on the surface. >> but when it comes from a man who continually tells us your children are our children, wehe are going to ensure the dignity of every human person. >> we're going to make sure that everybody is lifted up. he can't eve up. en do it for hn flesh and blood. so it ends up being a nonpolitical, personal tragedy in the family that now become dys a political anvil around his neck as he goes into this, because the idea that he's a great family man or the conciliato r who's goingg un to bring unity and love to everyone. that narrative is shotit . and what a shame, what a tragedy for the biden family. wh thet more importantly, for ts little girl. >> yeah, the little girlthis dot even want her to have the biden last name. i mean, it would it would be in the world. it would be worlda thing. r and it happens to beefn a reflection of reality. they've already doneofa real ths
few changes that they have made is not enough. we need an fbi that we had for generations that we can trust that we know is objective, that we know is nonpolitical, non-politicized, that is non-weaponized. that isn't corrupt, that doesn't use bad sources. i mean, just think of what really struck me among many things that day was the fbi was using just one source, i'll mention, da chenk co-this individual is a foreign agent, a bad guy. not only were they relying on his information which was a complete lie and never happened. false information. they were paying him for this. taking american tax dollars and i always think of working people as they must feel as they work their butt off to try make a living used to pay off this guy just to get information that they never verified and they
section of the justice department that handles some of the most sensitive political corruption cases. >> reporter: and potentially most difficult to prosecute, high-profile defendants with deep pockets. >> to head the public integrity section means that you are well aware of political optics and you know how to navigate a way to build a case, to leave no stone unturned. all with an eye towards ensuring people view the investigation as nonpolitical. >> jack smith does have a bit of a mixed record. several of his highest-profile cases ended up failing. he indicted the governor of virginia, then the supreme court threw the case out. he was involved in the indictment of senator bob menendez from new jersey which ended in acquittal, then that case got thrown out. he was involved in the prosecution of john edwards, former presidential candidate. that also failed. >> bringing in ambitious cases. they don't want to lose, but that is one of the things that happens to the justice department sometimes. >> reporter: losses and failures
don't think that they counted on coming to florida until the very end. i think that they must have had an internal discussion that they didn't want to go into all these delays in a fight over venue. they wanted to have this in washington, d.c. after all, trump got 5% of the vote in washington, d.c. and the judges in d.c. are more experienced in the national security matters. but they ultimately decided to go to south florida for a few reasons. i think first they knew that trump would challenge venue. they did not want a chance of losing the case. they didn't want endless delays over challenges to venue. and plus i think jack smith wanted the public to buy into this. one thing to go into d.c. in the friendly confines, but another thing to get the indictment in trump's home state, a red state in front of a grand jury of individuals from all walks of life, nonpolitical, and i think that that makes a statement. i think that the justice department did a good job in creating what is called a speaking indictment. they gave 49 pages of really
prosecute, high profile defendants with deep pockets. >> to head the public integrity section means you know how to navigate a way to build a case to leave no stone unturned, all with an eye insuring people view the investigation as nonpolitical. >> jack smith does have a bit of a mixed record. 1e6 rul of his high profile cases ended up fail, and he was involved in the indictment of senator bob menendez in new jersey that ended up in an aequipment, and that case got thrown out, and involved in the case of john edwards, and that case also failed. >> they don't want to lose, but that's one of the things that happens to the justice department sometimes. >> losses and failures that team trump has jumped on, tried to exploit and some might say, conflate. >> jack smith, he's a terrorists. he's a trump hater.
and each and every time itthey seemed to to always benefitnefi the subject and don't want to do any of this. i took an oath of office. and when i saw that egregiousness of some of these t things it wa, it no longer beca. a choice for me. itt i want'sething tha to do, something that i feel like i have to do. >> watch this whole interview. he's reluctant, he's nonpolitical. he doesn't want to be doin ie te . >>vi but the evidence is clear. we're now at the convergence of two major scandals, a compromised first family a d a corrupt federal government driven by politicall bias. here now with the latest foxbias news contributors, charlie hurt and miranda devine. charlie miranda, thanks for being with us tonight. randi, let me start with you. colmer wants to see a document the fbi has that isn't amanda. classified, but they're saying he can't see it even though he has a legal right to . will he see it? can the fbi stonewall? how do these things normally play out? >> you follow these things closely.
for the organisers, the european broadcaster and have turned down the request. 0ur political correspondent explains what's going on. via video tomorrow evening presumably to use the contest platform and the millions of viewers worldwide to try and rally and encourage voter support for his country in its fight against russia. the european broadcasting union in charge of running the contest had said that while his intentions were laudable that kind of address would go against its rules, which are that it should remain as a contest and nonpolitical. that has caused quite a political backlash of the uk for the uk prime minister rishi sunak st official spokesman has said that the prime minister was disappointed at this decision arguing that the
and —— and attract investment here in scotland. i'm focused on delivering for the people of scotland. delivering for the people of scotland-— delivering for the people of scotland. ,, ., , , scotland. should the next person be a nonpolitical— scotland. should the next person be a nonpolitical appointment? - scotland. should the next person be a nonpolitical appointment? as - scotland. should the next person be a nonpolitical appointment? as i - a nonpolitical appointment? as i said, i a nonpolitical appointment? as i said. i am _ a nonpolitical appointment? as i said, i am focusing _ a nonpolitical appointment? " i said, i am focusing on delivering for the people of scotland. should the next person _ for the people of scotland. should the next person be _ for the people of scotland. should the next person be a _ for the people of scotland. should the next person be a nonpolitical. the next person be a nonpolitical appointment? we the next person be a nonpolitical appointment?— the next person be a nonpolitical a- ointment? . . , ., ., appointment? we are “umping ahead. there is an appointment? we are jumping ahead. there is an established _ appointment? we are jumping ahead. there is an established process - appointment? we are jumping ahead. there is an established process for. there is an established process for that. we are joined now by labour's shadow culture secretary, lucy powell, who called for the investigation into the process of richard sharp's appointment. can we dive straight into that interview just given can we dive straight into that interviewjust given by rishi sunak, where he will not commit to the next appointment of bbc chairman being nonpolitical. what are you calling for? i nonpolitical. what are you calling for? ., ., nonpolitical. what are you calling for? . ., , , nonpolitical. what are you calling for? ., , ,, for? i want to see this process bein: for? i want to see this process being made — for? i want to see this process being made much _ for? i want to see this process being made much more - for? i want to see this process - being made much more independent, robust, transparent, so that we cant
didn't know they were turning other people off. people want to see sports as nonpolitical. politics stays out of the game. it doesn't need to be there. i mentioned he's in hot water. we talked about this. sports media doesn't like what phil had to say because so many sports media are on the far left. and i mean that with personal experience. very far left. and they see their own belief as nonpolitical, just simply on the side of morality. and so when somebody like jackson -- i don't know that he's conservative. >> that would be news to me. >> i don't know his politics. he said sports should be free of politics and they say no, you should endorse our politics. >> no doubt. that's extra happened, -- a that's what happened during covid, started with the blm stuff. nba different than bud light. bud light getting into a far left cause because that's what corporations do these days based on the pressures they have. you can go from the blue can to a silver can very easily. more difficult to say i'm