don't think that they counted on coming to florida until the very end. i think that they must have had an internal discussion that they didn't want to go into all these delays in a fight over venue. they wanted to have this in washington, d.c. after all, trump got 5% of the vote in washington, d.c. and the judges in d.c. are more experienced in the national security matters. but they ultimately decided to go to south florida for a few reasons. i think first they knew that trump would challenge venue. they did not want a chance of losing the case. they didn't want endless delays over challenges to venue. and plus i think jack smith wanted the public to buy into this. one thing to go into d.c. in the friendly confines, but another thing to get the indictment in trump's home state, a red state in front of a grand jury of individuals from all walks of life, nonpolitical, and i think that that makes a statement. i think that the justice department did a good job in creating what is called a speaking indictment. they gave 49 pages of really
prosecute, high profile defendants with deep pockets. >> to head the public integrity section means you know how to navigate a way to build a case to leave no stone unturned, all with an eye insuring people view the investigation as nonpolitical. >> jack smith does have a bit of a mixed record. 1e6 rul of his high profile cases ended up fail, and he was involved in the indictment of senator bob menendez in new jersey that ended up in an aequipment, and that case got thrown out, and involved in the case of john edwards, and that case also failed. >> they don't want to lose, but that's one of the things that happens to the justice department sometimes. >> losses and failures that team trump has jumped on, tried to exploit and some might say, conflate. >> jack smith, he's a terrorists. he's a trump hater.
and each and every time itthey seemed to to always benefitnefi the subject and don't want to do any of this. i took an oath of office. and when i saw that egregiousness of some of these t things it wa, it no longer beca. a choice for me. itt i want'sething tha to do, something that i feel like i have to do. >> watch this whole interview. he's reluctant, he's nonpolitical. he doesn't want to be doin ie te . >>vi but the evidence is clear. we're now at the convergence of two major scandals, a compromised first family a d a corrupt federal government driven by politicall bias. here now with the latest foxbias news contributors, charlie hurt and miranda devine. charlie miranda, thanks for being with us tonight. randi, let me start with you. colmer wants to see a document the fbi has that isn't amanda. classified, but they're saying he can't see it even though he has a legal right to . will he see it? can the fbi stonewall? how do these things normally play out? >> you follow these things closely.
for the organisers, the european broadcaster and have turned down the request. 0ur political correspondent explains what's going on. via video tomorrow evening presumably to use the contest platform and the millions of viewers worldwide to try and rally and encourage voter support for his country in its fight against russia. the european broadcasting union in charge of running the contest had said that while his intentions were laudable that kind of address would go against its rules, which are that it should remain as a contest and nonpolitical. that has caused quite a political backlash of the uk for the uk prime minister rishi sunak st official spokesman has said that the prime minister was disappointed at this decision arguing that the
and —— and attract investment here in scotland. i'm focused on delivering for the people of scotland. delivering for the people of scotland-— delivering for the people of scotland. ,, ., , , scotland. should the next person be a nonpolitical— scotland. should the next person be a nonpolitical appointment? - scotland. should the next person be a nonpolitical appointment? as - scotland. should the next person be a nonpolitical appointment? as i - a nonpolitical appointment? as i said, i a nonpolitical appointment? as i said. i am _ a nonpolitical appointment? as i said, i am focusing _ a nonpolitical appointment? " i said, i am focusing on delivering for the people of scotland. should the next person _ for the people of scotland. should the next person be _ for the people of scotland. should the next person be a _ for the people of scotland. should the next person be a nonpolitical. the next person be a nonpolitical appointment? we the next person be a nonpolitical appointment?— the next person be a nonpolitical a- ointment? . . , ., ., appointment? we are “umping ahead. there is an appointment? we are jumping ahead. there is an established _ appointment? we are jumping ahead. there is an established process - appointment? we are jumping ahead. there is an established process for. there is an established process for that. we are joined now by labour's shadow culture secretary, lucy powell, who called for the investigation into the process of richard sharp's appointment. can we dive straight into that interview just given can we dive straight into that interviewjust given by rishi sunak, where he will not commit to the next appointment of bbc chairman being nonpolitical. what are you calling for? i nonpolitical. what are you calling for? ., ., nonpolitical. what are you calling for? . ., , , nonpolitical. what are you calling for? ., , ,, for? i want to see this process bein: for? i want to see this process being made — for? i want to see this process being made much _ for? i want to see this process being made much more - for? i want to see this process - being made much more independent, robust, transparent, so that we cant
didn't know they were turning other people off. people want to see sports as nonpolitical. politics stays out of the game. it doesn't need to be there. i mentioned he's in hot water. we talked about this. sports media doesn't like what phil had to say because so many sports media are on the far left. and i mean that with personal experience. very far left. and they see their own belief as nonpolitical, just simply on the side of morality. and so when somebody like jackson -- i don't know that he's conservative. >> that would be news to me. >> i don't know his politics. he said sports should be free of politics and they say no, you should endorse our politics. >> no doubt. that's extra happened, -- a that's what happened during covid, started with the blm stuff. nba different than bud light. bud light getting into a far left cause because that's what corporations do these days based on the pressures they have. you can go from the blue can to a silver can very easily. more difficult to say i'm
nonpolitical. just two people talk about politics will, but we don't want to say well, uh, a liberal, a tive, republican democrat. that's one of the things that's already ruined television in general, and i know she's going to be a straight shooter. and you know, i'm gonna be a straight shooter and when we got together for lunch, we just started talking about random things. and it was really curious that we had different opinions, which is fine like we want to correct. it was wrong. continue, dear. go ahead, but we were like all i want is people. even if i disagree with them, i want them to be honest with me. i don't want them saying things to get clickbait that that's what drives me crazy about our people in our profession. right now. we're not trying to get people to click on going to be fair and honest and i, you know, i'm gonna do the same thing. i feel that about him too. and i think you know you just want a civil conversation. i like to that. it's no holds barred. you know, i'm very aware of people are watching. i don't think that i can just go on and say anything.
ban, and we need all americans and certain i'm proud to stand and say this is a right to which all americans are guaranteed, and we have to protect it. . americans are guaranteed, and we have to protect it.— have to protect it. . even yesterday. _ have to protect it. . even yesterday, donald - have to protect it. . evenj yesterday, donald trump have to protect it. . even - yesterday, donald trump said that have to protect it. . even _ yesterday, donald trump said that he considers a federal abortion being in a losing proposal by republicans and there is plenty of evidence of that in the midterms in november. i do note that there are very few republicans during their weight behind the decision in texas, so what chance is there of your bill getting through the house? i remain o timistic getting through the house? i remain optimistic that. _ getting through the house? i remain optimistic that, as _ getting through the house? i remain optimistic that, as he _ getting through the house? i remain optimistic that, as he said, - getting through the house? i remain optimistic that, as he said, this - getting through the house? i remain optimistic that, as he said, this is i optimistic that, as he said, this is a common sense and should be not only bipartisan but nonpolitical, that safe medication should be something every american has. i'm working genuinely to try to get, we have a lot of democrats imported try to get a few republicans on board to say that we will reaffirm that's right. that's my duty and obligation to work across the aisle. we don't have anyone signed on yet,
ports of entry. they wanted to deflect what the cartels are doing with illegal immigrants or crossers. 700 pounds is more than what's getting across, we don't have the resources in the field to actually properly patrol the border and he touched on that as well. that is what is so scary about border security and why border security is so important and that's why it's got to stop being politicized. democrats have to come together with republicans to give us the proper policies, programs and operations because we could stop it. when we put the uniform on, we can do what's necessary, we just have to be able to do it. >> sandra: and their voices have to be heard, right? why would you fathom the administration would not want to hear their perspectives? >> two schools of thought. they didn't want anybody to hear what they have to say, they know these are career employees, supposed to be nonpolitical, so supposed to go and testify to the truth. and that's exactly what we saw
npolitical opponents it iows n time for adam schiff to be heldn accountable in a court of law. have a full detailed report. former house intel chair will join us and also tonight we wil reveal aoc's big plan to be one happy coalition government on capitol hill. aoc can keep dreaming prove we want to taken ke a close look ac person the democrats would prefer is the next speaker of the house and that would be theo far left election done iran conspiracy theorists. and later yours yours truly liv in our last call segment. you get to have the last word oo the showre. we begin with more drama from washington and the swamp today a after two days, kevin mccarthy has not gone to the magic numbe of tort two out of at&t's be r ofspeaker of the house. twenty republicans intend you t oppose mccarthy. she will join us live in just a