Page 5 - Process Issue News Today

Activity. these guys sort of operate as a quasi government, control the whole city. this is not where you can just avoid a single person in your neighborhood who might be a bully. this is gangs who control the town, they set curfews, they tax you. this is very much in a classic sense persecution. >> i want to go to bigger conversation you and i were having in the break. justi justice sotomayor had a opinion on this. that the rule topples decades of asimem practices and without affording the publ...

They did of the mueller report to lay it out for the public in all likelihood did not read 400 pages of reverse back flip double negative language from mueller and his team and want to crystallize the issues in a way that might develop more support for acting on impeachment and they have been systematically stymied in their goal of a clear public narrative and it moved beyond the issue of what the president did to kind of the process issue of the fight for information and they still face the rea...

Is a lot of questions about mueller and i sort of worry that we think he is giving as you eureka moment. and i think what he tried to do and you can criticize or not is to say look there is a process process issue next either criminal or political with impeachment. im not part of the process anymore. im the substance guy. i provided volume one. plenty of evidence about bad things russians did. volume two. plenty of evidence about obstruction of justice. and so i just think the democrats have to ...

What amount they want to do, democrats have been clear. frankly, this is everybody sitting in the same room to resolve this. myself, joni ernst, david perdue, months ago, put out a proposal to say we can end government shutdowns in a simple way -- congresstant leave. everybody has to -- congresstant leave. everybody has to stay in session, on the floor, to resolve differences. thats the way you get things resolved. we tried to get it done earlier this year. this is not just a partisan issue, thi...

The committee, one of my concerns is a process issue and that is the fact that the committee is not being very effective in vetting and thats not a new phenomena, where people have slipped through the process and the examples i used were bill rehnquist who was caught dissembling twice, once to be an associate and once to be the chief and clarence thomas and i was warning the committee dont let that happen again because it tarnishes not only the justice but the court and hurts the american people...

Vote present. not for or against. that republicans from montana can stay at his daughters wedding. so, the 50-50 dream of mike pence the vice president. then he would get to come in and be the deciding vote that would hand the generation of jurisprudence. that is unlikely. sorry vice president. a man who knows a thing or two about devicive political fights. richard nixons former white house counsel. john dean. good to have you, sir. >> thank you chris. >> im not surprised we arrived at this occa...

That is so, really unfortunate thing, but that is how he got the there. >> and it is no surprise that he attacks dianne feinstein for the leaks. she comes from where the senate, your word is your bond. and she said she did not leak it. now if it is someone from congress or related to dr. ford remains to be seen, but i agree she did hold it too long, but she did not leak it. >> and that is part of the problem that is the safe harbor for a lot of the republican members of the committee is the proc...

With trade. im a former u.s. trade representative and so ive been involved in some of these issues and in this particular case, its the national security bill called the national defense authorization bill and this a revenue measure and the house would have the measure to send the bill back us to and we have to start over. its a process issue, but bob corker raises a good point with regard that the tariffs being imposed is because of the use of the 232 which is for national security arent necess...

Problem. i agree with the form commenter. he was asked about senator franken. there was a process issue. hes very close to senator frankenho immediately resigned. i do think he would never support anybody being forced to do something against their will. and i do agree the words chosen werent the best choices. but i think that -- thats exactly what he meant. he would never support somebody at any time in our history, norms should never change about doing something against peoples will. >> did it ...

Great regularity. he has to be precise and right on point, and he wasnt. >> heres what a spokesperson for bill clinton said. it was clear from the context he was not suggesting there was ever a time it was acceptable to do something against someones will. hes saying that norms have changed in a variety of ways and how we interact with one another, and thats all for the good. so is this a word choice problem, or is there more to it? what do you think of that statement? >> for sure its a word choi...