Released Aid News Today

Gaetz, paul manafort. The circle goes on. He is surrounded by criminals. Then we hear, well, it cant be Obstruction Of Congress, you could have all just went to court. Well, we are in december. We have an ongoing crime. We have a crime in progress. That is what the 911 call would say from a police officer. We have a crime in progress. And they are saying with a crime in progress, why didnt you just schedule an appointment to call the police . We have an emergency to our National Election going o...

Their argument. ive now given the article that the gentleman from california wants admitted again, perpetrating the falsehood that people were killed because of money. and in the own article biassed against the president and the whole situation, it has this line. although theres no way to link markoff directly to the aid. lets put stuff in here that proves the pathetic argument. it actually says theres no way to link it. yet were doing it every time in here. keep giving them. ill keep accepting ...

Anywhere. i yield back. >> i yield back. >> gentleman yields back. >> mr. chairman? >> gentleman yields back without objection, material will be inserted in the record. >> gentle lady is recognized. >> i would like to ask unanimous consent to put a roll call article into the record entitled ukrainian lie lives hung in the balance as trump held up aid. >> without objection. for what purpose does mr. johnson seek recognition? >> move to strike the last word. >> gentleman is recognized. >> thank yo...

For 30 positive tweets for an easy re-election, the other side is willing to betray the american people their precious right to vote and the future of our great country and with that, i yield back. >> gentleman yields back. >> for what purpose does gentleman seek recognition? >> strike the last word. >> gentleman is recognized. >> im really intrigued. first were told that the offense is withholding aid, even though it was provided and, in fact, provide d tremendously boh helpful in substance and...

Ambassador taylor, when he came and testified under oath, he said during our call on september 8th, ambassador sondland tried to explain president trump is a businessman, when a businessman is about to sign a check to someone who owes him something he asks that person to pay up before signing. i argued, he said, that made no sense. ukrainians did not owe president trump anything. thats true. they owed him nothing to get the white house meeting. they owed him nothing to get their aid, and they ow...

Really talking about corruption. no. the department of defense had said it was okay to release the aid here, because they had already certified that corruption wasnt an issue. the people on the ground, the ambassadors, the national security officials who had been appointed by this president say no, that is not an excuse. we then hear that omb officials, office of management and budget officials are saying, whoa, who is holding up the aid? we dont have a problem with the aid. oh, its the presiden...

He was really going to follow through. so, theyre saying that the person before this president, before president zelensky, the previous president of ukraine, was a corrupt individual. they said that through their remarks. if that president was corrupt why, if president trump cared so much about corruption, why did he release the aid in 2017 and 2018 to ukraine? then i would like to get to the question of this particular amendment. i looked at that omb letter and i would call that an after-the-fa...

Times" article. >> objection. >> outlining impeachment. >> we call that a mic drop moment. i yield back. >> the gentleman yields back. for what purpose do you seek recognition? >> to strike the last word. >> gentlelady is recognized. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i want to go back to the facts and back to this amendment. my colleague from florida said that this amendment is putting forward, quote, an understandable reason for why the president when would the aid and then suddenly released the aid....

That they were trying to get done? he did not do that. would they -- would that president inform top agencies about those concerns? no, he didnt do that either. in fact, they were all universally in agreement that the aid should be released. and might the president inform congress that this was something that he was concerned about and he had to withhold the aid? he didnt do that either. after-the-fact cover-up memo. thats all this is. we need to address that. >> gentleladys time has expired. >>...

Take our notes and participate in discussion, substantively, though. mr. trump did nothing wrong. each and every action of the president has been explained. we have offered the basis, the understanding. weve gained an understanding for why a president would have reasonable concern about ukraine, why a president would have specific concern about this biden/burisma nexus. you havent heard any defense of burisma. you havent heard them all say this is all bogus, the president should not have been as...