all of those characters, yoko is one but linda mccartney, we joke about this so much they re in the room working on long and winding road and he s showing off for her, his new girlfriend, and at that point you said he s completely convinced he will spend the rest of his life to her, which he will, and he s the most famous bachelor in the world and he s 26. that s the most incredible thing. they seem not 26. they seem like they lived eons everybody by the time he s 26. and it s mind-blowing. they have the wisdom of those 66 and one thing to be said, they re timeless. that could have been a great group recording in london last week. they looked timeless in there. absolutely. and we see loyalty, so many
you guys in here. i think to rob s point, the first movie turns out to be one of the great pieces of misinformation or disinformation. even all of us doors who read every single beatles book and bootlegs, everybody is under an impression and now you go back and think, oh, not only was it not right. it was absolutely wrong. you know who else was under the disinformation? the beatles themselves. reading the stuff you ve written about it, the two mole striking things is how much they loved each other and how much they were trying to hold together in this period. they re trying. it s like the centrifugal forces are pulling them apart, but they re in this realtime way trying to hold each other together because they love each other so much, and that s like the die mettic opposite of the
struck our justice and the cooperation, not collusion, always a fake term, it makes the point you re making to great effect in your piece, but here s the way i want to tie these two things up. we now live in this world where as you say people have basically completely distorted this history, and i ask you as we go forward whether you have the fear that i have, which is that the 1/6 commission is going to have the same thing happen to it, that the trump people are going to run out the clock, we re not going to get to a conclusive answer at the end of next year. the republicans take control of the house. the committee ends, and when then liv in a twilight zone going forward where 1/6 has the same thing done to it that the relationship with trump has done to iit. it s you can t see the forest through the trees. it will go looking for crimes. that s not what you need to know. if i could make one reform to the mainstream media, stop book
penalty when you get caught, what s the point? cops on the street don t want to cops on the straight don t want to make the arrest because they figure it s just going to be thrown out. they don t want to be taken to jail or taken to the courthouse to waste their time to file something that s going to go nowhere. the point you raise about when you re feeling safe, this is the time to remain vigilant. and we can adapt our policing without question, but we cannot just retreat from it and say there s certain things that are going to be permissible. you twunlt change the laws? look at marijuana. it s changed. it s recreational or medical, and those crimes have been voided from people s records. that s good reform. but to let it go makes no sense. i don t think anyone s trying to let it go. we know we have to give a
you recognize police violence in the country. you recognize there there s a huge amount of stuff that should be reformed, but you also don t mean defund the police. that s a bad slogan, bad policy. i think people who embraced that last year were embracing it because of some of the things that happened last year through it into a pretty stark light, how much needs to be fixed in the system. we have agreement on this. two things can be true. yes, 100%. i m just says sometimes people need to be thrown into jail because they re bad people. they re criminals. by the way, no cash bail? i understand it comes from a good place in people s hearts. it s a bad idea for violent crime. it s a really bad idea for a slew of crimes. i think that s a fair point, right? we want to end the mass incarceration state but we want