see if there s anything that s going to really put the focus on particular individuals who continue to deny that there was any involvement, you know, there s little snippets of president clinton that he likes them young, you know, does that mean anything? those are tidbits that i have not heard. i think the same prince andrew stories and all that, they ve become tiresome actually. let s focus on the david copperfields and people like that that have been mentioned. let s face it, some of these people, another point the survivors have made is most of the people s names coming out are bankers, politicians, hollywood types and are people going to keep supporting their lifestyle, go to their movies, banking with these people that have been proven involved in some way. it s not saying they had sex with these young girls but it is
happening for quite some time. i wonder, what sticks out to you? because, this is now the fourth indictment that we re talking about, 91 accumulative charges over four cases. and this is a significant one. it really is. on the one hand, laura, it s a reit of picked aleutian up everything that we have seen dating back to the january six committee. the hundred 61 overt acts, and most of them are not new. there is a few little snippets but their panoramic an encyclopedic in what they chronicle on the one hand. on the, other a really is something new. first, and i d say for the 18 other defendants, so this is the first time that all the president, men and women, including giuliani, mark meadows, i ll say that, twice mark meadows, eastman, chesbrough et cetera are all charged. and when you think sort of in a
hearings. in addition to the doj hearing that featured the letter of jeff clark that he requested to send to the georgia state legislator. so several snippets shown during the course of the summer is now laid out, and essentially, that conduct meets the level of georgia statutes that rises to criminal conduct for this rico charge. yeah. appreciate your work and your breakdown of that. chai, you re not here as a house investigator or as a legal expert. you re here because you have been so involved in how the democratic party has navigated these things. it would seem that there was an improvement or a learning curve. the january 6th committee distinguished itself because it was factual and bipartisan. but it only got to be that way because speaker pelosi decided where to draw the line and where to stare down the sort of political thugs and hijackers. it only got that way because liz
incapable. but the military commanders are not weak kneed men, they are su supposed to stand up to the president, saying this is untacticly unsound. the wrong thing to do, not one has put a star on the table. a good point. you know lisa according to snippets of the book, they knew it was going to happen. they didn t take they had a couple chances, david said they could have done something before, they really didn t do much there. we re talking about it now. but how long does this stay in the minds of the american people, will it matter in 2024 election? i don t kn i know it personally fills me with disgust, i believe that day was the unraveling of this presidency, he sold americans this lie he would be a competent leader, we saw, was a feckless leader,