Tech your username 6 hours ago After reviving a lawsuit against social media company Snap Inc. over its speed filter, which was dismissed in 2020 in the Northern District of California, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion on Tuesday reversing the district court’s dismissal and remanding the matter for further proceedings. The appellate panel consisting of Circuit Judges Kim McLane Wardlaw and Carlos T. Bea as well as District Judge James David Cain, Jr. found that Snap Inc., the parent company of social media app Snapchat, could be sued over a Snapchat filter that purportedly encouraged reckless driving by implicitly rewarding that behavior, concluding that Section 230 immunity did not apply.