A Component Part Supplier's Duty to Warn Following the U.S.

A Component Part Supplier's Duty to Warn Following the U.S. Supreme Court's Maritime Asbestos Decision | Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP


To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
Under the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability § 5, Comment b (1998), the supplier of a product generally must warn about only those risks associated with the product itself, not those associated with the “products and systems into which [it is] integrated.”
However, in
Air and Liquid Sys. Corp. v. DeVries, 139 S. Ct. 986 (2019), the Supreme Court created a different rule in the context of maritime asbestos claims.  In that case, the defendants produced “bare-metal” equipment, such as pumps, blowers, and turbines, for Navy ships that
required asbestos insulation or asbestos parts to function as intended.  The manufacturers delivered the equipment to the Navy without asbestos, and the Navy later added asbestos to the equipment.  Two Navy veterans were exposed to asbestos on the ships and developed cancer.  The district court granted summary judgment for the manufacturers, finding no duty to warn.  In reversing, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals adopted a “more plaintiff-friendly” foreseeability rule, rejecting the “more defendant-friendly” bare-metal defense.

Related Keywords

Tennessee , United States , , Supreme Court , John Crane Inc , Armstrong International Inc , Tennessee Supreme Court , Faegre Drinker Biddle Reath , Depot Inc , Third Circuit Court , Faegre Drinker Biddle , Products Liability , Two Navy , Third Circuit , டென்னசி , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , ஜான் கிரேன் இன்க் , ஆம்ஸ்ட்ராங் சர்வதேச இன்க் , டென்னசி உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , டிப்போ இன்க் , மூன்றாவது சுற்று நீதிமன்றம் , ப்ராடக்ட்ஸ் பொறுப்பு , இரண்டு கடற்படை , மூன்றாவது சுற்று ,

© 2025 Vimarsana