Good afternoon. The u. S. F judge of court of appeals for the Second Circuit. With his today along with the judges of the court of appeals are three distinguished justices of the Supreme Court. Justiceished circuit ruth bader ginsburg, our beloved colleague, former colleague, formce Sonia Sotomayor who many years was a member of this court. And, Justice Elena kagan a great friend of the Second Circuit who participated in our 125th Anniversary Program on Thurgood Marshall. Judicial colleagues, staff, members of the board, and friends of the Second Circuit it is an honor to welcome you here this afternoon to this special session of court as we bring to a close our courts your long retrospective marking 125 years of the u. S. Court of appeals the Second Circuit. Us, it is exciting to soin this historic room were many noteworthy cases have been adjudicated. Itchief judge, i serve first. All are committed to the Effective Administration of justice. We have been fortunate to have the great advocacy of those who have argued in this courtroom. When i proposed a project for the 100 25th Year Anniversary of our core, i did so not for anycelebration but because institution, if it is to do its work well should from time to past tolect on its better resolve the present in to meet the challenges of the future. To that end, my colleagues agreed to pursue a wide range of activities relating to the 125 Year Experience as we had done some 30 years ago. Dont worry, there will not he another 15 years from now. Consisted of a dedicated group of judges, court administrators, court staff, members of the bar, law school educators, and law students. To each of whom on behalf of our board i extend my deep gratitude. 120e look back on the fiveYear Anniversary project remarkablere some products. For example, a book of biographer use of judges of the circuit judge is published by the cornell law review. On the cases of the Second Circuit. A series of programs in the courthouse including sessions with Thurgood Marshall and others covered by cspan. A lecture on ulysses. A series of lectures on star ofes under the leadership others. And todays program with and our law School Anniversary committee. We have a wonderful circuit justice, ruth bader ginsburg. For more than 23 years, Justice Ginsburg has been our guardian, our guardian angel, any of the major proceedings we have are not complete without her. Her appearance at the Second Circuit conference is what we look most forward to each year and that she is with us at a difficult time in her core work every year at the circuit conference is more amazing. She is a special place in all of our hearts. Friend is one to us all. Justice ginsburg while knows in this courthouse, having served for judge palmieri, i know others in this courtroom 18 years ago that Justice Ginsburg swore me and with the wonderful wonderfulurg Marty Ginsburg present. Before i introduce her i would just like to know what the Holiday Season approaching, with your gift approaching, i andgnize Justice Ginsburg the book of her life. Justice ginsburg. [applause] Justice Ginsburg it is a delight to be with all of you for this celebration. I know to start my remarks with a brief remembrance of things past. Likewas the Second Circuit 195919 61, the years i served for judge palmieri and how did those days compare with the circuit today . Most evident difference is the size of the court. It has grown. The courts in 1959 was six all were male. So, too, world of the district judges. Today there are 11 active judges, 10 seniors and service. Ive the 11 active judges, seven or may allah and for our me know. Three on occasion. Male and for of them are female. In 1959, it was the year Henry Friendly was appointed and senior circuit judge learned hand was still a hearing cases. July 1959june 1960, the court of appeals closed 554 cases. 20152016 case dispositions of mounted 4743. 1959istrict court bench in numbered 32 active judges and eight seniors. In thedistrict judges 52 activeclude members and 51 seniors. Exist,tcy judges did not although as a recall district expertwere aided by bankruptcy referees. No magistrate judges, only parttime commissioners with authority to issue search and arrest warrants and set bail bonds. The most notable decision 57 appellations in the conspiracy case, United States on appeal inrgued decided in november of 1960. The case stemmed from a gathering of some 58 men, most with italian surnames. The men used a village in new man long suspected of leading illegal gambling in upstate new york. Departing from the meeting, many of the artistic pence were questioned by the Police Awaiting them before they hit the main road. Each answered independently. Why they accounts of were there varied, but none default the purpose of the gathering. Presiding judge irving townsend, the court convicted 20 of conspiracy to abstract justice and commit perjury. Convicted defendants served terms running from 35 years. I sat in on parts of the trial, as did many others. It was quite a show. In an opinion by judge lombard, the court of appeals roundly reversed the convictions. With no evidence of the meetings , the government could not by indicting attendees for conspiracy to lie for the reason about the gathering. It was entirely likely the court of appeal said that each defendant decided for them self to not discuss what they knew about the meeting. The message conveyed suspicion in the social desirability of sending bad men to jail is no substitute for proof of crime. Without reaching any constitutional question, the Second Circuit cautioned the government against shotgun conspiracy charges and admonished 12 judges in deciding the government had to make a case to go to the jury to analyze the evidence and each defendant with meticulous care. A prosecutioned framed on such a doubtful basis should never have been initiated or allowed to proceed so far. For in america, we still respect the ignorant he of the individuals even an unsavory to beter is not imprisoned except on definite proof of specific crimes. Instructive judgment for dontutors and justice, you agree. Theme turn that to remarkable man were celebrating this remarkable year. Dyed twonoble hand years before he entered law school. He was a man who thrived on the District Court but understood the importance of collegiality on an appellate bench. It was written on his passing, harmoniously combining discipline and compassion, he was one of those rare persons who made virtue attractive and nobility convincing. We can draw inspiration from then he gave two lawyers in 1951, not the best of time for our nation. Fears and concerned about the individual, no matter how inconspicuous. First to be in dire straits, he recalled. And we may be very sure we will not be the last. What we can do, he said, is to set out resolutely to understand this mysterious age and to contribute at least one more voice of reason to a distracted world. Good advice for our time. Fortune favored me. When learnedears, hand grace the federal bench from 19591961, i served in those years. A wise and kind Southern District judge, judge palmieri. His home was one lockup from judge hands. He regularly drove the revered elder judge home at the end of the day. Uptown with rode them, seated in the back of judge paul marries mercedes. Dutch judge palmieris mercedes. Mercedes. S ballots,ld be poetry, and sometimes calvinist hems if he was in a sober mood. His vocabulary was large and uninhibited. My mother never taught me. About any other judge, including those who served on the Supreme Court, i wanted to serve for the man his friends affectionately billy. B, for why i asked from my backseat, why dont you engage women . It would not cause you to censor your speech judging from what i have heard back here. Notg lady, he answered, im looking at you. ] aughter ginsburg and that is how it was then. Most of what i know from judge hand comes from a biography of learned hand, 25 years of a work in progress. In 1994. Ished 680 pages, trimmed down. At my washington, d. C. , welcoming circuit in 1980i asked my teacher at columbia before conveyest to stanford to something from the luminous pages from learned hand. Advice fitting for a federal judge. Jury chose and delivered words from judge hands 1939 memorial tribute to Benjamin Nathan cardoza. Of him, judge hand said, he never disguised the difficulties is lazy judges do to win the game by sweeping all the opposing just pieces off the table. He would often start by stating the other side better than his adversary had stated it himself. At times, for those of us in new him, the anguish which it seated the hard decision was apparent. Opinions very blunt, but he knew it was the judges duty ultimately to decide, not endlessly to debate. To expression here colleagues he respected tell us at least as much about him as they do about the colleague. His 52 euros on the federal bench, he contributed enormously to jurist rudiments which still guides us. Long before the Supreme Court reversed course, he was a leading critic. While still a district judge, he protectiven approach of politically unpopular speech. His opinion in that case may appointment ton the next vacancy on the appellate bench. The Second Circuit reversed learned hands decision but 18 years later, the Supreme Court inraced and stated deportation cases he revealed another already. Compassion and caring. Appreciation that Court Decisions affect the lives of everyday people. If appointed to the Supreme Court and, chief justice taft feared he would pair with a defender. Become ultimately it rested on his power to persuade and persuade others he had to persuade himself. The biography tells for example how learned hand was agonized over cases, diagrams, raging pens, pencils, and equals to represent the positions of ships and ears. Thetimes he reached exasperation point. When i told him the judges 13 draft still did not get it quite right. Learned hand hurled a paperweight in his direction and then consoled the distraught clerk with an affectionate pat on the head. That comforting to know learned hands eloquent opinions did not spring from the head as zeus. One recalled the in the touching portrait of learned hand published by the federal law council in 1983, he was never sure about anything except the importance of searching for the truth. More expansively, my dear learnedue david wrote hands necessities saw every judges common obligation. Suspicion of the easy cases, skepticism about clearedged categories, modest story in place of residence comic can door in playing one worthy. Nciple against another best known of learned hands public addresses, the remarks he made at mayor laguardias request at central park on may 21 in the war year 1944. Over 1. 5ience of million including 150,000 new league naturalized citizens, learned hand spoke of liberty not as an ideal written on parchment it is a spirit lodged in the hearts of men and women. Reminiscent i will quote learned hands famous words. What end is the spirit of liberty . I cannot define it. I can only tell you my own faith. The spirit of liberty is a spirit which is not to surely it is right. The spirit of liberty is the spirit which seeks to understand the mindset of other men and women. The spirit of liberty is the spirit which ways their interest alongside its own without bias. In a kingdom where that spirit learned hand said, the least shall be heard in considered sidebyside with the greatest. Say amen. Y we [applause] to live for that very special remembrance Justice Ginsburg, we are so grateful for those words. At our Opening Program last year, i made a comparison of the court to an orchestra. A great architecture like a great court depends upon a shared view and deep commitment to the values and purposes of the enterprise. They mayrs, though come with different perspectives, though they may play different instruments, read from the same score. Labor in an ongoing and noncompetitive relationship with one another, respect one anothers strengths, for go ego for the greater good, on her patients and recognize the excellence of the combined energies, experiences, and insights of the full complement of players. 125thnductor for our Anniversary Program has been judge richard p wesley call now to review the year past and discuss those are made it possible. A former judge, a former elected legislator, richard is a person of substantial talent and ability as a jurist and colleague. He has been the perfect chair of our committee. Courtg closely with our administrators and their teams. Affairs, ouregal clerk of court, all the teams. All who have worked on this so fullyhich has captivated the indy gauged our judges, court, staff, barter, scholars, and law students. Andll i say thank you bravo. Judge wesley, as the final series of our concert is played, will you please take the podium . [applause] you notice out karen is always reminding me to do something. Ofhink she is the spirit betty wesley reincarnated, who years ago. 12 or 13 a personal thank you for your kind words. I deeply respect and appreciate the trust you place in me and i hope the efforts we put forth up and worthy of that trust and respect. I am honored by the people i mentioned to you tonight. I am honored to hold this responsibility you entrusted to me. The desired for me to believe it has been three years since the chief asked me to cheer the 125th anniversary. We are here tonight to conclude the final celebration of the 125th anniversary here. What a spectacular year it has been. Chief, would like to personally thank you for the confidence you placed in me for this assignment. Committee ofa circuit judges, respected members of our bar, and begin this journey on october 20 6, it concludes tonight. The planning for those events midoctober 2014 and took over two years before we launched our very first event. During the course of planning and presenting of the events, the members of the committee deal. D a great a great deal about the men and women who brought the cases to this great court and about those who have labored here. I think all of us agree this was time very well spent. We have published two publications. The circuit judges biographical apology published by that great school which happens to be my alma mater, the cornell law review and now the cornell press. And a volume of seven substantive articles on jurist jurisprudence by the florida law review. And they were well received by scholars and judges and lawyers alike. I believe the two deans of those institutions are with us today. There they are. Gentlemen, please rise. [applause] wesley it did not take any time at all to respond to the request. It was a joy for the judges of the court to work with both members of the staffing and the authors who wrote the articles. It was a tremendous collaborative effort and i think the students enjoyed it greatly and i know the judges enjoyed it greatly. The judges worked so hard on giving us their biographies. I was good at wearing them down. It was a wonderful expense. Of us benefited from us it. If you go around the country or sit on the committee, talking about what we were doing and the Second Circuit to some of my country, iaround the said we are publishing an anthology, biographies of the judges and also a group of seven articles about the jurisprudence and the seventh circuit. Silence. None of the other circuits have gone to the extent we have gone to celebrate the joy of 125 years in our court. I did promise judge katzmann i would be brief and i know he knows that was a false promise. But one of my purposes is a set of thank you singalong overdue. I am delighted to report the hard work and cooperation of the initial expectations. I can remember the first meeting, talking about what were going to do. John, you are there. Sarah. Threed maybe we would do of them. We did 14. We never even had thought about anthologyphies or the of significant areas of jurisprudence. I know that the court is well pleased and justly proud of the work of the committee on this initiative. There are so many people to thank that i am concerned about brevity and overlooking some people. So while i have got the podium i will try. Let me begin with the members of the 125th Anniversary Committee. My judge members. The clerk of the court. Attorney. Staff our Circuit Library and who has in his abilityg to search down obscure facts and put things up in beautiful murals in the hallways. Professor from st. Johns law school. Others. Is ael cardoza, there court of appeals name for you. If anyone is a true historian of this court it is john. Tina. Karen. Professor john fagan. Nd our own circuit executive to that end, i would ask that all members of our 125th Anniversary Committee who are here, i asked that you stand and be recognized by a round of applause. [applause] judge wesley net was a very short stand, bob. Had a case against the new york court of appeals. I reported that court the day after the argument, i lost 61. I was the only one who voted for your mom, bob. And i thought, i made a terrible mistake. I am in the wrong court. Nobody agrees with me. All right. The anniversary concludes today with a special session. By lecture to be delivered columbia law professor thomas w hand whobout judge along with his brother sat on the bench. Contributed have significantly to the jur