works for the "wall street journal." brett, you wrote an article with the very neutral title, "an anti-israeli president," how do you get to that conclusion and how do you justify? >> he gave a speech on thursday in which he suggested that israel withdraw to some approximate of the '67 lines with mutually agreed swaps. we all know about that. the basic problem is existent l existential. and when the president puts the existential questions of jerusalem, but particularly palestinian refugees whose with rights, mahmoud abbas, a moderate, strongly opposed, it's a conflict. >> the president agrees there is the existential threat, that's why the president said the territorial issue isn't the hard one. property isn't the risk here. the risk, he said, is that hamas and fatah no longer agree that you should exist. and he said to israel, as long as hamas says you do not have a right to exist, you do not need