my point. >> hold on. >> so states like iowa and -- >> what's wrong with -- just posing the question. what's wrong with the population deciding that? >> farming states like iowa, rust belt, would be ignored, interests ignored and interests only in urban areas like new york and california be represented. and whole slew of people. >> there's nothing wrong with that. that's why i think bill o'reilly's point is wrong, brought unnecessarily this racial component. i don't think there's anything wrong with saying the democratic party feels would have more power if the electoral college abandoned and reline on the urban areas. o'reilly's premise even wrong, he referenced new york. look at new york, chicago and l.a., white males still largest