the backward looking, they view it as casting down on the val validity of the election. forward looking, they want to engineer a significant reset, a change in our relationship with russia, with vladimir putin, and they view this as basically an inconvenient kind of truth. as jain said, though, quoting ronald reagan, facts are stubborn things. >> you know what trump's team says, show us the evidence. we don't just take the intelligence agencies at their word. they got weapons of mass destruction wrong. we need to see the evidence. is that a standard that is too high? will the intelligence agencies ever open the files and show even the president-elect their evidence? >> i assume they will show the president-elect their evidence. whether they show all of us to the public is something else. the question is always the issue in these kinds of espionage questions, releasing information provides the target guidance on