dame to rome he stayed in that villa and lived here. so that's the association with peter. not a burial, but he actually was active in this place. there's no disputing that these traditions were very, very strong. we have literary traditions, archaeological evidence, we have this graffiti. so we have a lot of circumstantial evidence, but nothing that ties us back to the exact time and place which we really need to say that peter was here in this place. >> it's controversial, but could science now provide that missing evidence? professor tom are relic hunters from oxford university. they aren't allowed access to the bones found e beneath the vatican, so they have tracked down two teeth believed to have come from peter to a a basilica in belgium. he thinks the relics were brought here from rome in the 7th century.