the state doesn't have standing, all of these were things raised and decided by washington versus trump. if i could -- >> did the washington panel decide the application of mandel on the merits or simply say that courts have jurisdiction to review such things? >> it resolved the question of whether the mandel standard -- >> you think our panel is bound by that? >> i do. if i could read to you the language from washington versus trump, this is found page 1162. the government cites mandel for the proposition that, quote, when the executive exercise immigration authority on the basis of a facially legitimate and bona fide reason, the court also not look beyond that. apply that this standard governs judicial review executive exercises of immigration authority. in fact, the mandel standard applies only to issue or deny individual visa. present case is not about that application of a specifically