for the misunderstand of the president's tweet because many think it's about sexual innuendoes. >> only if your mind is in the gutter would you have read it that way. so no. >> it's also an argument that they used during the megyn kelly comments made by the president. you clearly don't buy that, that it has nothing to do with sex. >> i think it's completely preposterous. you can use the same language to a man and same language to a woman, and i tell you, means completely different things. everyone knows what trump meant when he said that megyn elk was bleeding from her wherever. and everyone knew what the president meant when he said that kirsten gillibrand was willing to do anythi"anything". >> the editorial went on to be sure, quote, with his latest tweet clearly implying a united states senator would trade sexual favors, president trump