three work streams. he can say it all he wants, it doesn't mean anything in the end. >> how do you see this playing out? >> i think there's a little bit of a jedi mind trick happening. because as you said, don, collusion doesn't have any legal meaning, so you can throw it out there. and i guess in some vague way that it's true. as juliet mentioned, we have two people who have pleaded guilty. one of them has basically admitted he is having -- michael flynn, the national security adviser who is basically having secret conversations about sanctions and lying about it. we have somebody else who was the foreign policy adviser, having sketchy meetings with a russian professor who was linked to russian intelligence. we have a 12 count indictment against his former campaign manager who is paid by russian sources and laundering money and also failed to register as a foreign agent many i mean, none