states as it interprets the first amendment to the constitution. so there's no legislation that could get around what the supreme court has articulated as what the libel standards are. >> i read the book. in the book it asserts that he doesn't read, doesn't read policy, doesn't read books, doesn't know history. he's kind of proving the book -- parts of the book true by saying, we're going to work on the liable laws, what have you. many people are smiling as you're not telling the truth and profiting off of it, they're going, "are you talking about yourself"? >> yeah. in most white houses when presidents articulate policy agendas, it's because somebody -- there's been a policy shop within the white house that's looked, examined, explored proposals. there's nothing here to back up what he's saying when he says we're going to look at the libel laws in this country. >> david, why would he even go there? why would people in the white house especially considering the