attorney/client perspective. anything that implicates that privilege is reviewed separately by the court and determinations will be made as to whether it is protected or not protected. if it is not protected, it is given to the review team to go forward. if it is protected, it is sequestered and not used. privilege is alive and well and functions the way it should function. the bigger problem with cohen in the case is he is not practicing law. the privilege doesn't even apply. >> that is a distinction for the investigators. one of the end-runs here is the investigators have said in the push back through the attorneys is we're looking at information where cohen is not acting an an attorney, but as a business -- acting as an attorney, but as a businessman. let's stay with privilege. no, i don't want you looking at communications with my attorney to decide if it is privileged. once you see it, my privilege