the judge seemingly suggested that he could have given it to her on a piece of paper, perhaps she would have not read it in open court. she may have reviewed it in camera. at some point the lawyer decided to just blurt out in open court that it was sean hannity. >> by the way, we don't know if sean hannity is really a client. >> yeah. >> since sean hannity say i never gave him any money. i never gave michael cohen any money, never retained his legal services. occasionally i would run a couple legal issues off him, bounce ideas off him. is he a client or not? is he protected by attorney/client privileges or not. >> so the question with respect to sean hannity is what was the legal relationship, if any? and really for the individuals that michael cohen is asserting privilege over, were they actually legitimate clients? because it's the client that owns the privilege, not the lawyer. >> okay. then sean hannity says that he wasn't a client. >> he did. >> so no privilege, right?