come to the party! does she have a point? i think what it is, kate is it's an extension of the politization of an entity, house intelligence committee and the intelligence world more generally that hasn't traditionally been all that polarized. so i think when you saw the report come out earlier and devin nunes and republicans saying only this is what we found. there is no collusion and we didn't find that the russian government was working to elect donald trump and house intelligence democrats saying that's not at all our conclusion and that's your first big sign in the real break of what's traditionally been a relatively bipart stan panel and bipartisan in relation to congress, and this is the next step of that. you would think in years past you would have the corresponding at least ranking members on the house intelligence committee so