>> what may be difficult for you in reconciling this as an advocate of his, will be this is so different than his posture back in '98 when he was working for ken starr is he was such a bulldog on the most tawdry types of invasion into a president's life legally during his tenure, and then for him to write in 2009, he doesn't think that clinton should have been exposed to that. what does that tell you about the man? if he was so willing to do something so whole heaheartedly thinks is wrong, what does that tell you about him? >> i don't think that is a conflict. we don't know the terms of the internal role of crafting the things. >> you see the questions that he wrote up for bill clinton? did you see those questions that he wrote up for him? i wouldn't even talk like that in a locker room as we've learned as now some type of parallel, you know, some parallel rules for parlance with men. he wrote some of the most tawdry, ugly questions to form perjury traps which i'm not