this linkage can be made. there is no collusion, there is no collusion, does this allegation chip away from that claim? >> i am so glad you asked that. they remain consistent in one thing in one big idea that there is no collusion. to support that they came up with a bunch of mini claims that there is no kak and we didn't know what was going on and no one knew of wikileaks. each outline wf those ends up being a lot and absolutely a lot so we are now to a point where there is no factual bases to support the one claim that is keeping this fallacy together which is that there is no collusion by the trump campaign with the russians. one quick other thing, this great cnn story was the second story today about june 9th,