different. you can argue context, but that's not an altered tape. >> that's giuliani's argument, that it has altered. cnn hired an audio forensics expert who previewed the recording. this was his take. >> well, the clip is incomplete. we've got the beginning, i believe. i can see a start signature at the beginning of this recording. in other words, when the recorder was engaged. where the dialogue just abruptly ends and some new conversation comes in, there is a splicer and edit there. those two pieces are cut together. i can clearly see that. i'm certain any other forensic expert with the same qualifications would agree with me. >> so what does that mean to the uninitiated? >> that means that this is not an original, it's not a master, and it's not a complete recording. >> it means their conversation may well have continued beyond
Related Keywords
Tape , Rudy Giuliani , Cnn , Expert , Context , Audio Forensics , Argument , Beginning , Recording , Words , Recorder , Start Signature , Clip , Stake , Conversation , Dialogue , Splicer , Pieces , Cut , Two , Original , Qualifications , Master , Uninitiated ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.