>> you've given me -- >> it's an anonymous letter, victor. that's the problem when you quote anonymous letters and put it up as if it's gospel. and coming from "the new york times" to me is suspect itself. >> should sessions investigate? should the doj investigate? >> i think they should look at it. is there sedition? is there treason? you can't say that there is based on that letter, but there is an allusion that something's going on. there is a verification that there is a deep state, if you will, which the president was laughed at for many years. we do know that you have people like lisa page and peter strzok and bruce ohr, 25 doj officials have had to -- >> we're talking about -- listen, we know that the department of justice has ramped up their investigation of leaks, but that's based on releasing classified information, which would be a crime. what is the crime? you've given me, again, a list of questions and a list of ifs. don't you need more than that to start a federal investigation?