serena protested. that was her choice. she then broke her racket later on a match where she was being outplayed significantly by a 20-year-old named naomi osaka, who deserved the win. the racket smash triggered a second point deduction. those are the rules. that takes us to what matters most here, okay? the third violation and the penalty of a whole game being taken from serena williams. that's when she went at it with the chair umpire. that's what caused that third violation. and this is what has jumped the net from the tennis court to the court of public opinion. would ramos treat a man the same way? what do we know? he has not done the same thing to a man in hotly contested major finals like this one. but was it sexism on display? serena called him a thief who stole a point from her. no profanity. so was it what she said, or was it who it was coming from? instead of seeing the most