and what he did in that testimony was show someone who was angry, vengable, self-pitying and threatening. literally, he looked at the democratic side of the committee and said, "what comes around goes around." he blamed the witness testimony before him, the brave survivor who offered credible and powerful testimony about the sexual assault, blamed that testimony on left wing cabal and the clintons. so this op-ed in no way removes the issue of temperament and it is the reason that former justice john paul stevens today said that performance last week was disqualifying, and why thousands of lawyers and former judges around the country are writing to us, asking us to disapprove this nomination. >> i should point out, because i made this mistake earlier, what he said about the clintons was that the opposition by the