committee, jerry nadler, he said this weekend if the president did direct his former attorney, michael cohen, to make hush payments to women, they would be impeachable offenses, is how he put it. whether they're important enough, though, he goes on to say, to justify impeachment is a different question. where do you land on this? >> i think the chairman or the soon-to-be chairman nadler is correct on this. if you take the republican standard, the republicans impeached bill clinton for telling one lie and for committing obstruction of justice about one affair. allegedly, according to the u.s. attorney in the southern district of new york, president trump directed a whole campaign finance cover-up scheme to pay off his former mistresses in order to conceal two affairs that he had. so it's pretty much the same kind of offense, although there were -- >> the president says that -- the reporting is that the president is worried about the house moving to impeach him. should he be worried?