that, you know, obstruction in this way, firing comey, the president is allowed to fire whomever he wants, whenever he wants, but there are other ways to obstruct justice. and as you were just talking about with pardons, et cetera, et cetera, it seems to me that the democrats are going to come down and focus more on the obstruction issue and maybe try and get him to say, well, what would constitute obstruction from a president? setting aside where you think the president cannot obstruct justice, i.e. comey. we don't know that mueller is just looking at comey on obstruction. he might be looking at other things. >> i agree with that. >> he said to intervene in something that he has a personal stake in would be an abuse of power. well, we reported not too long ago that the president has called up matthew whitaker, the acting attorney general, to raise the question about the prosecution of his former fixer and attorney michael cohen and