as i understand it, that continues and what's also unique is that the supreme court allowing them to do this under seal. that would be a first, right? basically the public doesn't know the full identity of the parties arguing here before the high court. >> that's right, poppy. i'm not aware of another instance where this is really the first step here, the court saying they can file the paperwork under seal. we will be staying tuned to see if more information dribbles out that helps identify why this is being requested under seal and what the fighting arguments are in this. if it proceeds further, if the court were to decide to take this up then the question will be does it remain under seal or is it such importance for the supreme court to take it up that they force more sun light. at this point we are just at the stage of saying they can file their requests under seal and then make some of this available