and my question is you think the public pressure led them to reach a different conclusion? you are saying they applied the same criteria? >> of course it did. if you look at last week they had 20 books on the list. my book outsold 18 of them. they don't want people to read the book "a time for truth." they left it off and then they accuse me of bulk sales. i say that is a lie either produce evidence or apologize. then my publisher said that is a lie. we have sales data. amazon and barns of noble came out and said that's a lie. so i'm glad the "new york times" listed it. i appreciate their listing it. it seems to me there are a lot of conservative authors the "new york times" discriminates against. there is a need for the public editor to investigate their methodology. they levelled a false charmg at me that has been refuted publically. if they want to be credible