nothing to reduce the onshore liability, which will be the real liability for bp. the big liability will come from economic damages to property holders, shrimpers, fishermen and small businesses onshore. in the exxon valdez case, exxon removed 8% of the oil. they spilled 11 million gallons and only removed one. part of the reason is the company doesn't want to remove them. it wants to appear like it's trying to remove them. every barrel it removes cuts money, $100,000, from its bottom line. and it doesn't reduce commensurately the liability of the company by $100,000 onshore. probably not even $1. so via bp's best bet at this point is to hide the oil, which it's been doing, using these dispersants, which are dangerous on their own, but are much more dangerous when you combine them with the oil. they force the oil to sink so
Related Keywords
Nothing , Bp , Fishermen , Liability , Property Holders , Damages , Businesses , Shrimpers , Soil , Company , Part , Exxon , Reason , Doesn T , Exxon Valdez Case , 11 Million , 8 , One , Barrel , Commensurately , Cuts Money , Bottom Line , 100000 , , 00000 , 1 , Point , Dispersants , Bet , Doing ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.