people with pre-existing conditions and i think that that's a promise that we can fulfill. >> the reason they bring this up, sir, i'm not playing james. i read terry, who says it's not constitutional and i know that you're raising all of these constitutional objections under original content and very narrow definition ofs of the constitutional on the conservative side. a lot of people on your side are saying these things are constitutional and i'm just wondering if you're one of them, that's all. >> yeah. >> i don't think that it. >> well, the house rules are going to require flaany bill that's brought forward in the future including our replacement will have to cite where in the constitution the authority's given to be able do x, y, or z. >> congressman, thank you. keep working at it. aaron schock. >> thanks for having me back on. two years ago as a new member i came on your show for the first day and now it's my second term and i'm back on. i appreciate you having me here. >> you're always welcome. please come back, mr. schock. joining me now is steve israel. thank you, congressman israel. you saw the conundrum that the republicans are getting into,