democratic candidate. it's a democratic candidate. it's a 3-3 split. the republicans said it was fine. the democrats said it was not fine because they are all thinking of the category of employers more broadly. >> it's not illegal. it's hard to say that anything is clearly illegal outside criminally defined per am ters. they are unable to agree on what is legal and what is illegal. >> if it's allowed, it's reported as a donation to the candidate. some companies, most companies would be reluctant to do that. they would be on the record as taking their employees time for this political purpose. >> let me do something dangerous here. to push back on this we can't start legislating this. it seems to me that speech in the workplace that emanates from the top down as a different kind of fundamental quality.