in a fairly recent poll in pennsylvania head-to-head and doing best head-to-head with her nationally and everybody else in your party is trying to be a hawk and you're the only one that says i don't think the american republican voter, the religion republican, not the neo-con, not someone who reads "the weekly standard" by a regular republican voter is tired of these war. why does bill kristol have all the influence. >> hasn't traveled outside the beltway enough. once he gets out into the rest of america in kentucky where we live in middle part of the america or anyone outside the beltway, there's a disconnect between the washington insiders and the rest of us in both parties. hillary clinton is much more hawkish and more likely to get us involved in another war, than most of america, republican or democrat. you see the little boomlet for other people on democrat side. people aren't so eager to believe that his his was right to take us to war in libya, and so i think you'll find that as it gets out to the regular voters outside of washington,