that debate there. i believe a bottom up process works better than top down. >> i agree with you on your process changes that you want. if a speaker candidate said to you "i will give you everything you want in process on issues, we will just have to agree to disagree. could you live with that compromise? that at least you have to process that you want so your view on immigration or taxation or whatever the issue is could come to a vote in the committee with the new process? >> it's a weighing process but the short answer is yes. if we can make enough headway on process issues, that helps to offset the public policy issues. for example, with kevin mccarthy, i had this kind of discussi discussion. kevin mccarthy was in large part in agreement with what i was suggesting on the process side and i probably would have voted for him on the house floor despite serious disagreements on the policy side. >> congressman brooks, as you know, your complaints about process were complaints democrats had about process when their leadership was running the ship the same way with them. congressman mo brooks, thank you for joining us tonight.