>> he wasn't saying hobby lobby deserves to win. he was saying under statute it's awkward for judges to say that's not your rjsz view. given you believe this and this and this, you can't believe this other thg. well f you're in a religion, often you have views people outside that religious faith tradition might find odd. he was saying, at least at the threshold of litigation, under this religious freedom restoration act, we should take people at their word when they say they actually have a religious province. doesn't mean they should win but it does mean judges should not be too light to basically say, oh, that's not really a religious objections. you're not affected by that. your religious views aren't impacted by the government practice that you're objecting to. instead, let's come to court and then we can evaluate your claim against the cost that's imposing on others, on society, on, perhaps, nonreligious adherence, people of other faits. >> can i jump in here? >> go ahead.